Help
1N 2H
2S 4C
4D 5H
2H transfer, 4C splinter, 4D cue, 5H exclusion.
Does the 5H bid imply a club void also (else why 4C?), or can responder splinter in a stiff with a side void, or are we just giving him room to have operated somehow with the 4C bid?
Page 1 of 1
Double exclusion?
#1
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,488
- Joined: 2006-March-23
- Gender:Male
Posted 2010-February-05, 01:37
The artist formerly known as jlall
#2
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 974
- Joined: 2005-April-06
Posted 2010-February-05, 02:45
I vote for giving him room to operate. Maybe he has a slam force opposite a diamond card, this seems like a fine sequence then. If he really has double void, GSF will still be available after a round of cuebidding.
#3
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,987
- Joined: 2009-February-15
Posted 2010-February-05, 02:56
I'm with Karlson here.
and the result can be plotted on a graph.
#4
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 3,525
- Joined: 2009-March-30
- Gender:Male
Posted 2010-February-05, 09:36
sounds like partner has solid ♠!
OK
bed
bed
#5
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,640
- Joined: 2009-February-16
Posted 2010-February-05, 09:45
I would just answer exclusion for hearts. Maybe partner bid this way with 0 hearts and 1 club to give us more room for a cuebid. Maybe he has ♣AKQ and wanted to see whether we have a diamond card (it's pretty much a 100% sure way to find out with that holding).
"Are you saying that LTC merits a more respectful dismissal?"
#6
- World International Master without a clue
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 17,404
- Joined: 2003-November-13
- Gender:Male
- Location:madrid
Posted 2010-February-05, 12:09
I was thinking about ♣KQJ but what anyway, agree with cherdano
#7
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 974
- Joined: 2005-April-06
Posted 2010-February-05, 12:10
Well it only matters if we're looking at the ♣A, but make cherdano's example KQJ and it works fine.
Page 1 of 1