[P_Marlowe]

The_Hog, on Jan 18 2010, 05:08 AM, said:

P_Marlowe, on Jan 18 2010, 04:13 PM, said:

Hi,

2NT is still hearts and clubs, ..., lets say 5-4, high tech at work.
It may make sense to play 2H in this seq. as 4 hearts, 5 clubs, and
2NT as 5 hearts , 4 clubs.

With kind regards
Marlowe

So you are forcing to the 3 level on a 4-5 shape? heiliger Hammelbraten!

No, and of course I have discussed, that X over 2D is for T/O.

And even if I would force to the 3 level with 54, I would have done this
a round before, I agree, not everyones cup of coffee, but given the right
vul., why not, they nned to catch you.
They get their chance, to know about the possibile 54, if they ever ask, but
will they be able?

With kind regards
Marlowe

[hanp]

gwnn, on Jan 18 2010, 06:20 AM, said:

yes I meant generalized 1444.

Nice.

[whereagles]

bravo, gonzalo

[gwnn]

what do you mean?

x
JTxxx
x
AQTxxx

was partner's hand (favorable at imps). I passed like Helene suggested and told my p that I am going to pass most bids that I don't understand (that wasn't the only reason I passed)