BBO Discussion Forums: Do you open? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Do you open? Why?

Poll: Would you open? (51 member(s) have cast votes)

Would you open?

  1. Yes (19 votes [37.25%])

    Percentage of vote: 37.25%

  2. No (23 votes [45.10%])

    Percentage of vote: 45.10%

  3. It depends on... (9 votes [17.65%])

    Percentage of vote: 17.65%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   Hanoi5 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,083
  • Joined: 2006-August-31
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Santiago, Chile
  • Interests:Bridge, Video Games, Languages, Travelling.

Posted 2010-January-09, 21:17

White vs red, dealer passes, you hold:

♠KT872
♥KQ8
♦K73
♣85

What's you call? Why?

 wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:

Also, he rates to not have a heart void when he leads the ♥3.


 rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:

Besides playing for fun, most people also like to play bridge to win


My YouTube Channel
0

#2 User is offline   TimG 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,972
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maine, USA

Posted 2010-January-09, 21:41

I pass because my hand isn't very good.
0

#3 User is offline   Jlall 

  • Follower of 655321
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,293
  • Joined: 2008-December-05
  • Interests:drinking, women, bridge...what else?

Posted 2010-January-09, 21:55

I mean, absolutely depends on what my partner expects for an opening bid obviously.

If this question is meant to ask "Do you think playing a style where this is an opening bid is a good idea in a standardish system" I would say it probably doesn't matter much at imps, but it's definitely a good idea in MP.

If this question is meant to ask "Do you open in a pickup partnership playing a standardish system?" I would say partner would not expect me to open this light since that is not standard, so I would pass at imps, but I would still open at MP because I think the gains outweigh the risks involved with misleading partner.
0

#4 User is offline   Siegmund 

  • Alchemist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,764
  • Joined: 2004-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Beside a little lake in northwestern Montana
  • Interests:Creator of the 'grbbridge' LaTeX typesetting package.

Posted 2010-January-10, 00:34

In my non-Drury-playing partnerships this is a semi-mandatory opening, because we're going to have a rebid problem if we pass and partner opens 1♥. (If you do play Drury, there is a similar set of marginal hands with long clubs that open to avoid a rebid problem.)

Otherwise, looks optional and very borderline to me. If you do open make sure you've chosen your rebid after 1♠-2♣ and 1♠-2♦. If I am playing Drury I think I pass even at MPs.
0

#5 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2010-January-10, 02:27

I would have opened as dealer w/r for nuisance. I wouldn't open like this, ty.

edit: just to clarify, I don't only open it in 1st seat and w/r. I'm sure I'd open it in other seats too but mainly when I'm NV.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#6 User is offline   Vampyr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,611
  • Joined: 2009-September-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:London

Posted 2010-January-10, 03:03

I would open this with my favourite partner, because we open 1NT 11-14 NV. We could open 1S, I suppose, but we must open something.

Again, it depends on what my agreements are.
I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones -- Albert Einstein
0

#7 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2010-January-10, 05:14

partnership style issue, in second position I don't open this crap.
BridgeGod: my personal website with interactive problems and articles
0

#8 User is offline   pooltuna 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,814
  • Joined: 2009-July-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Orleans

Posted 2010-January-10, 07:40

Hanoi5, on Jan 9 2010, 10:17 PM, said:

White vs red, dealer passes, you hold:

♠KT872
♥KQ8
♦K73
♣85

What's you call? Why?

...on who I am playing with and whether the system is built to handle an opening. IMO I don't think I can open this hand using any 2/1 system.
"Tell me of your home world, Usul"
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"

"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."

George Bernard Shaw
0

#9 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,782
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-January-10, 08:29

sure.....again as others said....if that is our agreement, npp. I could even have a bit worse at this vul.

Kxxx
KJxx
Kxx
xx
0

#10 User is offline   dake50 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,211
  • Joined: 2006-April-22

Posted 2010-January-10, 09:18

What's wrong with leaving this hand to respond to partner's opener or delayed/
reopening 2S? I see nothing.
0

#11 User is offline   hotShot 

  • Axxx Axx Axx Axx
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,976
  • Joined: 2003-August-31
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-January-10, 09:30

This depends on the partnership agreements about openings in 2nd seat and the corresponding agreements for openings in 4th seat.

If it's agreed that 1♠ can be a weak opening, I prefer that.
0

#12 User is offline   hotShot 

  • Axxx Axx Axx Axx
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,976
  • Joined: 2003-August-31
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-January-10, 09:49

dake50, on Jan 10 2010, 04:18 PM, said:

What's wrong with leaving this hand to respond to partner's opener or delayed/
reopening 2S? I see nothing.

If you don't mind the obvious 3 reasons:

- Your 1♠ bid is quite preemptive and forces your LHO to risk an overcall on the 2 level opposite a passed partner.

- Partner might not open in 4th seat without a spade length. Since you have 5 ♠ he's less likely to have ♠ length.

- Opps might preempt aggressively in 3rd seat keeping your partner and you from entering the bidding.
0

#13 User is offline   Winstonm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,289
  • Joined: 2005-January-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tulsa, Oklahoma
  • Interests:Art, music

Posted 2010-January-10, 09:53

Jlall, on Jan 9 2010, 10:55 PM, said:

I mean, absolutely depends on what my partner expects for an opening bid obviously.

If this question is meant to ask "Do you think playing a style where this is an opening bid is a good idea in a standardish system" I would say it probably doesn't matter much at imps, but it's definitely a good idea in MP.

If this question is meant to ask "Do you open in a pickup partnership playing a standardish system?" I would say partner would not expect me to open this light since that is not standard, so I would pass at imps, but I would still open at MP because I think the gains outweigh the risks involved with misleading partner.

At last the perfect explanation. Nothing to add.
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."
0

#14 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,892
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-January-10, 13:41

Hi,

To open or not is first of all a systemic and a partnership agreement think.

We dont open such a hand.

The reason being, that my partner found out, that sub min strength openings dont
work well opposite me, ...,
but if you want a more serious argument, although this is also an important point,
which does not get mentioned often:

If you open 1S, you dont have a sensible rebid.

If you happen to play a weak NT with 11-14, and dont mind to have a 5 card major,
when you open 1NT, than I would say, go ahead.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#15 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2010-January-10, 14:59

I would never open in 1st or 2nd seat playing a standard system. But I'm old and a wimp.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#16 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2010-January-10, 16:14

obvious 9-11 NT lol
0

#17 User is offline   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,117
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2010-January-10, 16:30

If I open this, it would have to be with a 12-14 1N, and I don't like the fact that it's aceless and the intermediates while good are not stellar. Pass for me.
0

#18 User is offline   billw55 

  • enigmatic
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,757
  • Joined: 2009-July-31
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-January-11, 07:53

let's see ..

pros:
boss suit

cons:
no aces
no shortness
two lonely kings

Overall I say pass. But if both pointy kings were spades, I would open B)
Life is long and beautiful, if bad things happen, good things will follow.
-gwnn
0

#19 User is offline   hanp 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,987
  • Joined: 2009-February-15

Posted 2010-January-11, 08:09

25 Zars.
and the result can be plotted on a graph.
0

#20 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2010-January-11, 09:18

Justin rules.... well said.
Kind Regards

Roland

Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users