how to bid? 1S-(3C)
#1
Posted 2010-January-03, 05:14
Q
QTxxxx
AJx
xxx
partner opens 1S, RHO calls 3C
all nonvul
Qn 1: what do you bid now? double? or pass?
generally, to make a negX at the 2 level, you need 8 hcp or so
so to make a negX at the 3 level... do you need more? how much more?
Qn 2: assuming you passed the first time round, now partner bids 4H and it's back to you
what do you bid? the possibilities I can think of are:
a. pass
b. 5D (surely can't be natural)
c. 5H (in case partner thinks 5D is nat)
now how much do you lean towards bidding and how much towards passing?
is it fair to assume that partner may have bid 4H based on you holding a random 6-7 pointer for him? or is it wrong for partner to do that and he must have bid 4H on his own strength only?
#2
Posted 2010-January-03, 07:11
If partner bids 4♥ you have a 5♥ bid avaible to show lack of ♣ control.
Also you can bid 4NT and assume partner has ♣ shortness given that you have 3 (with doubleton you better don't try this), seems to work fine, adn you keep 7♥ into the picture
#3
Posted 2010-January-03, 07:48
raist, on Jan 3 2010, 06:14 AM, said:
Q
QTxxxx
AJx
xxx
partner opens 1S, RHO calls 3C
all nonvul
Qn 1: what do you bid now? double? or pass?
generally, to make a negX at the 2 level, you need 8 hcp or so
so to make a negX at the 3 level... do you need more? how much more?
Qn 2: assuming you passed the first time round, now partner bids 4H and it's back to you
what do you bid? the possibilities I can think of are:
a. pass
b. 5D (surely can't be natural)
c. 5H (in case partner thinks 5D is nat)
now how much do you lean towards bidding and how much towards passing?
is it fair to assume that partner may have bid 4H based on you holding a random 6-7 pointer for him? or is it wrong for partner to do that and he must have bid 4H on his own strength only?
1) I pass. IMO for a 3 level -X you need the equivalent of a LR for the two suits you say you have.
2) I tend to agree with b} but play with too many crazy players so I would bid d)6♥ and if you didn't notice I am leaning towards bidding
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#4
Posted 2010-January-03, 08:08
raist, on Jan 3 2010, 06:14 AM, said:
Q
QTxxxx
AJx
xxx
partner opens 1S, RHO calls 3C
all nonvul
Qn 1: what do you bid now? double? or pass?
generally, to make a negX at the 2 level, you need 8 hcp or so
so to make a negX at the 3 level... do you need more? how much more?
Qn 2: assuming you passed the first time round, now partner bids 4H and it's back to you
what do you bid? the possibilities I can think of are:
a. pass
b. 5D (surely can't be natural)
c. 5H (in case partner thinks 5D is nat)
now how much do you lean towards bidding and how much towards passing?
is it fair to assume that partner may have bid 4H based on you holding a random 6-7 pointer for him? or is it wrong for partner to do that and he must have bid 4H on his own strength only?
Using NFB's this is relatively straight forward. I would bid 3♥, decline after a 4♥ raise. This can only go any further if partner cue bids 4♣, otherwise I cannot see any way to avoiding losing the first 2 tricks in ♣.
Many do not like NFB's, so this would not be an option, but I like a compromise between NFB's and the forcing response.
#5
Posted 2010-January-03, 08:16
#6
Posted 2010-January-03, 08:16
-NFB's are wide ranged calls
-You have the 3 level to reinvite a NFB
-Playing at the 3 level to make a part score is a small target, wide range into small target is a bad idea.
#7
Posted 2010-January-03, 08:25
Fluffy, on Jan 3 2010, 09:16 AM, said:
-NFB's are wide ranged calls
-You have the 3 level to reinvite a NFB
-Playing at the 3 level to make a part score is a small target, wide range into small target is a bad idea.
So 1♠ - 2♥ - 3♦ is not a NFB?
You can apply this how ever you wish, as long as the system can accommodate all options.
#8
Posted 2010-January-03, 08:34
#9
Posted 2010-January-03, 10:27
2) I now cue with 5♦. Given that I passed it seems a bit impossible for partner to know we have this hand. If partner signs off I'm tempted to just bid 6 over that anyway as it's very likely for partner to be 65.
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
#10
Posted 2010-January-03, 10:38
I pass, partner will try to reopen with shortness in club, if he also
has 3 cards, ..., we can let them play 3C.
We play Tranfser after intervention, so 3D would show hearts, but
the hand is too weak, even for NFB, since we would bascialy promise
a hand worth 8-11.
4H by partner should show 6-5, afterall he bypassed 3H, so there is
no need to worry about a side suit control.
You have the Ace of diamonds, ... it is either Pass or 6H.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#11
Posted 2010-January-04, 02:59
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#12
Posted 2010-January-04, 04:05
2. Having passed I'd bid 4NT (RKCB) now. If there's a risk pard misunderstands... well, 6♥.
#13
Posted 2010-January-06, 15:38
After the continuation given, I would bid 5♥ (asking for club control) and bid 7♥ if partner cuebids 6♣. Opposite an unreliable partner I would just bid RKC.
#14
Posted 2010-January-07, 01:36
I try 5 Heart or 5 diamond.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#15
Posted 2010-January-07, 08:35
-gwnn

Help
