Posted 2009-December-05, 23:27
Partner does not have a 2♠ call, IMO. If I had to select an even number of spades, I'd bid 4♠ with that hand.
I mean, look at what Opener has. His pure LTC with five losers (two spades, one heart, one diamond, and one club). A "normal response" usually provides two covers. so, game should make. Give partner a nice minimum like AQxx in spades, and you need diamonds working out and the heart King right.
Plus, things should work out. When RHO makes a two-level overcall, they have points. So, the heart Ace is more likely placed right. Plus, diamonds look nice. If partner has just two of them, you might get to ruff out the diamond loser. If three small, diamonds could split 2-2.
So, the major problem with this sequence is that 2♠ was a gross underbid.
Assessing results after the early auction goes off the rails is a bad idea. You just don't know what would have happened in the situation where partner actually has a 2♠ bid. Maybe 5♠ cannot make, but partner takes more tricks in diamonds, because everything splits better for defense. I mean, give partner just AKxx in diamonds, another heart, and another club, and he has his bid. But, then 5♣ is more in jeopardy because the opponents need to find places for two more diamonds, and they have one fewer club.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.
Sitting south partner deals and bidding goes:
1D-(p)-1S-(2c)
2S-(p)-4S-(p)
p -(5c)-???