BBO Discussion Forums: yuck yuck - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

yuck yuck

#1 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2009-November-27, 18:03

AQ106
Q96
A62
1084


1-(2)-X-(pass)
3-(pass)-???


2 the round before would had been No forcing.
0

#2 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,394
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Odense, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2009-November-27, 18:17

If 4 is CoG I bid that. Otherwise 4.

I suppose 3 is out as that would show 5+.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#3 User is offline   mikeh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,521
  • Joined: 2005-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.

Posted 2009-November-27, 18:42

While Ed Manfield (I think) wrote some very good material on CoG cuebids, many years ago in the BW, and while I think that in theory this is an excellent spot and use for one, I don't play with anyone who would take it that way. I think everyone I play with would take it as a slam try...neutral as to a control in clubs, but the only way to force to game below game, and unambiguously agreeing on hearts, for now at least.

I would bid 4. It has to be forcing: if one lacked the hand to force, one would (should) either have passed 3, or bid 3 now, or bid 2 last time (one does not negative double with 4=2=4=3 8 counts in my book...bid 2 and hope for more bidding if we have a spade fit).
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
0

#4 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2009-November-28, 18:52

Since 2 would be non forcing I thoink 4 would be a strong heart raise rather than COG.
0

#5 User is offline   pooltuna 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,814
  • Joined: 2009-July-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Orleans

Posted 2009-November-28, 19:05

Fluffy, on Nov 27 2009, 07:03 PM, said:

AQ106
Q96
A62
1084


1-(2)-X-(pass)
3-(pass)-???


2 the round before would had been No forcing.

4
"Tell me of your home world, Usul"
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"

"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."

George Bernard Shaw
0

#6 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2009-November-28, 20:01

4 by process of elimination has to show something like this, given my default agreement that 4 is a heart raise. If partner is like 3442 with 18, we will just have to play 4.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#7 User is offline   dake50 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,211
  • Joined: 2006-April-22

Posted 2009-November-28, 22:59

9 could neg X at 2-level. I have 3= one trick more. I try 4D to announce double fit and no Q-bid 4C as 0-1C.
0

#8 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2009-November-29, 03:56

jdonn, on Nov 29 2009, 03:01 AM, said:

4 by process of elimination has to show something like this, given my default agreement that 4 is a heart raise.

How would you bid with A10xx Jxx Kxxx xx?
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#9 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2009-November-29, 13:14

gnasher, on Nov 29 2009, 04:56 AM, said:

jdonn, on Nov 29 2009, 03:01 AM, said:

4 by process of elimination has to show something like this, given my default agreement that 4 is a heart raise.

How would you bid with A10xx Jxx Kxxx xx?

Are you trying to catch me into thinking 4 has to be a choice of games?

If I thought I was worth game I'd bid 4, if I didn't I would pass.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#10 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,800
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2009-November-29, 13:30

Even if 2S would have been forcing, I doubt I would have bid 2S.
2S should show a 5 carder.

Similar, if I now bid 3S, this showes a 5 carder, ..., of course 2S
forcing would imply, that 3S now would be at best values.

As it is, I am still bidding 3S, hopefully in time.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#11 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2009-November-29, 14:20

jdonn, on Nov 29 2009, 08:14 PM, said:

Are you trying to catch me into thinking 4 has to be a choice of games?

If I thought I was worth game I'd bid 4, if I didn't I would pass.

Maybe if you're strong enough to double without both majors you're strong enough to play in game once partner shows a good hand.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#12 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2009-November-29, 14:49

gnasher, on Nov 29 2009, 03:20 PM, said:

jdonn, on Nov 29 2009, 08:14 PM, said:

Are you trying to catch me into thinking 4 has to be a choice of games?

If I thought I was worth game I'd bid 4, if I didn't I would pass.

Maybe if you're strong enough to double without both majors you're strong enough to play in game once partner shows a good hand.

Ok, maybe true. I guess I just don't see where you were going with your original question then...
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#13 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2009-November-29, 16:44

jdonn, on Nov 29 2009, 09:49 PM, said:

Ok, maybe true. I guess I just don't see where you were going with your original question then...

I didn't know where I was going with my original question. It was just a question :)
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#14 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2009-November-30, 01:56

I would bid 3 Spade.

If partner raises me with 3451 or a similar hand spades may be better then hearts or diamonds. If he bids 3 NT I am fine too.

If he bids 4 Clubs, I try 4 Diamond.
Over 4 Diamond I try 5.

For his bidding partner should be unbalanced because he cannot have a balanced hand and jump to 3 HEart (He did not open 1 NT..). So we need to find out where his shortness is. 3 Spade does this job better then 4 Diamond or any other choice.
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#15 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2009-November-30, 14:23

Certainly the 4-3 spade game would had been better than the 4-3 heart game I played. The problem is that partner might raise you on doubleton.

I had

Jx
AK10x
KJ109xx
x

4 made on some kind of dummy reversal losing just 1 spade 1 heart and 1 club.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users