yuck yuck
#1
Posted 2009-November-27, 18:03
♥Q96
♦A62
♣1084
1♦-(2♣)-X-(pass)
3♥-(pass)-???
2♠ the round before would had been No forcing.
#2
Posted 2009-November-27, 18:17
I suppose 3♠ is out as that would show 5+.
#3
Posted 2009-November-27, 18:42
I would bid 4♦. It has to be forcing: if one lacked the hand to force, one would (should) either have passed 3♥, or bid 3♠ now, or bid 2♦ last time (one does not negative double with 4=2=4=3 8 counts in my book...bid 2♦ and hope for more bidding if we have a spade fit).
#4
Posted 2009-November-28, 18:52
#5
Posted 2009-November-28, 19:05
Fluffy, on Nov 27 2009, 07:03 PM, said:
♥Q96
♦A62
♣1084
1♦-(2♣)-X-(pass)
3♥-(pass)-???
2♠ the round before would had been No forcing.
4♥
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#6
Posted 2009-November-28, 20:01
#7
Posted 2009-November-28, 22:59
#8
Posted 2009-November-29, 03:56
jdonn, on Nov 29 2009, 03:01 AM, said:
How would you bid with A10xx Jxx Kxxx xx?
#9
Posted 2009-November-29, 13:14
gnasher, on Nov 29 2009, 04:56 AM, said:
jdonn, on Nov 29 2009, 03:01 AM, said:
How would you bid with A10xx Jxx Kxxx xx?
Are you trying to catch me into thinking 4♣ has to be a choice of games?
If I thought I was worth game I'd bid 4♦, if I didn't I would pass.
#10
Posted 2009-November-29, 13:30
2S should show a 5 carder.
Similar, if I now bid 3S, this showes a 5 carder, ..., of course 2S
forcing would imply, that 3S now would be at best values.
As it is, I am still bidding 3S, hopefully in time.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#11
Posted 2009-November-29, 14:20
jdonn, on Nov 29 2009, 08:14 PM, said:
If I thought I was worth game I'd bid 4♦, if I didn't I would pass.
Maybe if you're strong enough to double without both majors you're strong enough to play in game once partner shows a good hand.
#12
Posted 2009-November-29, 14:49
gnasher, on Nov 29 2009, 03:20 PM, said:
jdonn, on Nov 29 2009, 08:14 PM, said:
If I thought I was worth game I'd bid 4♦, if I didn't I would pass.
Maybe if you're strong enough to double without both majors you're strong enough to play in game once partner shows a good hand.
Ok, maybe true. I guess I just don't see where you were going with your original question then...
#13
Posted 2009-November-29, 16:44
jdonn, on Nov 29 2009, 09:49 PM, said:
I didn't know where I was going with my original question. It was just a question
#14
Posted 2009-November-30, 01:56
If partner raises me with 3451 or a similar hand spades may be better then hearts or diamonds. If he bids 3 NT I am fine too.
If he bids 4 Clubs, I try 4 Diamond.
Over 4 Diamond I try 5.
For his bidding partner should be unbalanced because he cannot have a balanced hand and jump to 3 HEart (He did not open 1 NT..). So we need to find out where his shortness is. 3 Spade does this job better then 4 Diamond or any other choice.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#15
Posted 2009-November-30, 14:23
I had
♠Jx
♥AK10x
♦KJ109xx
♣x
4♥ made on some kind of dummy reversal losing just 1 spade 1 heart and 1 club.

Help
