Help
I might convert the second double if on lead.... maybe. And lead a trump.
I'd not even consider this here.
I'm passing now. If this is enough for game, partner would have bid it already.
raise with the jack?
#21
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 3,727
- Joined: 2006-June-05
- Location:Oslo, Norway
- Interests:Bridge, sports, Sci-fi, fantasy
Posted 2009-December-03, 15:34
Kind regards,
Harald
Harald
#22
- World International Master without a clue
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 17,404
- Joined: 2003-November-13
- Gender:Male
- Location:madrid
Posted 2009-December-03, 16:37
Consider this sequence:
(1♠)-X-(2♦)-ps
(ps)-X-(2♠)-ps
(ps)-X-(ps)-3♣
(ps)-3♥
Would this be forcing?. I mean: how many times do you have to double a partscore before bidding your suit for it to be considered forcing?
(1♠)-X-(2♦)-ps
(ps)-X-(2♠)-ps
(ps)-X-(ps)-3♣
(ps)-3♥
Would this be forcing?. I mean: how many times do you have to double a partscore before bidding your suit for it to be considered forcing?
#23
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 14,900
- Joined: 2004-May-11
- Gender:Male
- Location:Portugal
- Interests:Everything!
Posted 2009-December-04, 04:30
Fluffy, on Dec 2 2009, 02:00 AM, said:
whereagles, on Dec 1 2009, 10:42 AM, said:
Perhaps we can reach an agreement: double twice, then 3♠ instead of 3♥ 
That's what our opponents did, and they reached 5♣ for -800. 3♠ later doesn't show both suits.
who were they? certainly not passarinho, ahah...