evaluating partner's shortnes without fit
#1
Posted 2009-November-29, 16:43
♥AQ6
♦Q5
♣QJ752
1NT-2NT (transfer to diamonds)
3♦-3♠ (3♠ = 8+ with spade shortness)
??
you could had supperaccepted with 3♣ if it matters
IMPs, but feel free to comment different approach at MPs
#2
Posted 2009-November-29, 16:46
#3
Posted 2009-November-29, 16:52
#6
Posted 2009-November-29, 22:34
I dont like spade shortness, I dont have diamond support, why would I venture past what the whole world is in on such a lousy holding.
www.longbeachbridge.com
#7
Posted 2009-November-29, 23:37
#8
Posted 2009-November-30, 06:43
maggieb, on Nov 29 2009, 05:46 PM, said:
Do you bid 4D because of your big diamond fit or because of your lack of spade stopper?
#9
Posted 2009-November-30, 06:55
x
Kxx
KJxxxx
Kxx
then 5♦ is better. But if he rates to have instead
x
Jxx
AKxxxx
xxx
then I'll look silly if I don't bid 3NT. At table I'd probably go with the 3NT bid.
#10
Posted 2009-November-30, 14:14
♠x
♥xxx
♦AK10xx
♣AKxx
3NT buried the cold slam and the good grand slam. If it wasn't slow at least I might had reopened, but didn't feel like it on a tank.
#11
Posted 2009-November-30, 15:18
#12
Posted 2009-November-30, 15:37
Fluffy, on Nov 30 2009, 03:14 PM, said:
♠x
♥xxx
♦AK10xx
♣AKxx
3NT buried the cold slam and the good grand slam. If it wasn't slow at least I might had reopened, but didn't feel like it on a tank.
Didn't partner show 6 diamonds? Most of us enlightened ones have a bid to show 1-3 in the majors with both minors.
I also think partner should pull 3NT to 4♣. He could easily have slam and is strong enough that 4NT is probably safe if not.
#13
Posted 2009-November-30, 16:24
-P.J. Painter.
#14
Posted 2009-November-30, 16:35
jdonn, on Nov 30 2009, 10:37 PM, said:
Everything is a trade off - maybe there isn't room for a bid to show that in their methods.
Agree with (an in-tempo) 3NT, this is an auction where you just have to make your decision quickly. I can certainly sympathise with not wanting to pull a slow 3NT.
#15
Posted 2009-November-30, 16:53
kenrexford, on Nov 30 2009, 05:24 PM, said:
How does partner's x being the ten increase our stopper power? Is LHO going to underlead the KQ twice?
#16
Posted 2009-November-30, 17:50
#17
Posted 2009-November-30, 18:07
jdonn, on Nov 30 2009, 11:53 PM, said:
kenrexford, on Nov 30 2009, 05:24 PM, said:
How does partner's x being the ten increase our stopper power? Is LHO going to underlead the KQ twice?
The suit might not be led, but be switched to by RHO.
#18
Posted 2009-December-01, 03:30
Anyway, perhaps pard could have bid 4♣ instead of 3♠. With 14 hcp and long suits, responder can afford to play 4NT if opener can't support a minor. (I'm assuming 4NT over 4♣ = misfit, pls pass.)
There are just so many hands on responder that make 3NT good that it's hard to know that 4♣ over 3♠ is the key bid.
#19
Posted 2009-December-01, 03:49
Fluffy, on Nov 30 2009, 09:14 PM, said:
♠x
♥xxx
♦AK10xx
♣AKxx
3NT buried the cold slam and the good grand slam. If it wasn't slow at least I might had reopened, but didn't feel like it on a tank.
Even with partner's hesitation I think you should bid 4♣. You know that you have a combined 29-count, and you have AK-AK. Opposite some muck like KQ10x KQJ Jx QJxx, 4NT is completely safe. Opposite KQ10x AQx Jx QJxx slam is pretty good.
#20
Posted 2009-December-02, 01:15

Help
