4th Suit Forcing
#1
Posted 2009-November-21, 00:44
Why ?
#2
Posted 2009-November-21, 01:17
#5
Posted 2009-November-21, 03:46
#6
Posted 2009-November-21, 04:59
XYZ is probably better in 1m-1♥-1♠. Maybe Pavlichek's method is better.
#7
Posted 2009-November-21, 06:26
H_KARLUK, on Nov 21 2009, 08:44 AM, said:
Why ?
I like it, because it means we have strong hands and will play game or slam.
Finding your own mistakes is more productive than looking for partner's. It improves your game and is good for your soul. (Nige1)
#8
Posted 2009-November-21, 08:23
H_KARLUK, on Nov 21 2009, 01:44 AM, said:
Why ?
I accept it as a necessary evil
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#9
Posted 2009-November-21, 08:48
#10
Posted 2009-November-21, 09:19
Winstonm, on Nov 21 2009, 09:48 AM, said:
Not necessarily. There might be something to be said for fourth suit crap. Or, FSC.
An example:
1♣-1♥
1♠-?
1NT = normal
2♣ = normal
2♦ = some weak hand where I want to rebid hearts or raise spades or something else weak
2♥ = heart rebid, forcing
2♠ = heart raise, forcing
I mean, it MIGHT have some merits...
-P.J. Painter.
#11
Posted 2009-November-21, 09:43
Quote
A real friend would post the telephone number, too.
#12
Posted 2009-November-21, 11:26
kenrexford, on Nov 21 2009, 10:19 AM, said:
Winstonm, on Nov 21 2009, 09:48 AM, said:
Not necessarily. There might be something to be said for fourth suit crap. Or, FSC.
An example:
1♣-1♥
1♠-?
1NT = normal
2♣ = normal
2♦ = some weak hand where I want to rebid hearts or raise spades or something else weak
2♥ = heart rebid, forcing
2♠ = heart raise, forcing
I mean, it MIGHT have some merits...
A long time ago (I was younger than most of the juniors that post here) in a galaxy, far far away, I had submitted the following to the Bridge World for consideration:
After a 1/1/1:
1N = one round force - like a forcing NT
2x = one round force - or game forcing.
I only played it with one or two partners. I had mixed results with it, but for some reason it worked better with weak NT's.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#13
Posted 2009-November-21, 20:53
barmar, on Nov 21 2009, 03:26 AM, said:
That's th question.
#14
Posted 2009-November-21, 21:18
In principle a fourth suit invitational-plus structure might be okay, but it often seems to muddy the waters as to what is forcing, and requires opener to jump the bidding just to show a good hand. The fact that I tend to raise very freely on three card support also reduces the need for an invitational fourth suit bid (i.e. I would raise spades on the auction 1♦-1♠-2♣ with three-card support, so there's not really a need to use 2♥ as a checkback for three-card support, but a GF'ing relay to right-side 3NT and/or find out opener's shape for a minor-suit slam can be really useful).
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#15
Posted 2009-November-21, 22:28
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
Our ultimate goal on defense is to know by trick two or three everyone's hand at the table. -- Mike777
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
#16
Posted 2009-November-23, 03:56
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#17
Posted 2009-November-23, 07:19
George Carlin
#18
Posted 2009-November-24, 01:32
gwnn, on Nov 23 2009, 10:19 PM, said:
Actually my partner forced me to do that too... it simply shows the other major, what else?
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...

Help
