BBO Discussion Forums: Sight unseen - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Sight unseen

#1 User is offline   H_KARLUK 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 973
  • Joined: 2006-March-17
  • Gender:Male

  Posted 2009-November-05, 06:49

Scoring: MP


North starts with 1 ♥. Your righty overcalls 2NT lowest 2 suits.

How would you go with your best partner ?
We all know that light travels faster than sound. That's why certain people appear bright until you hear them speak. Quoted by Albert Einstein.
0

#2 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2009-November-05, 06:56

nonexpert 3C, limit+ raise of H
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#3 User is offline   andy_h 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,962
  • Joined: 2007-September-14
  • Location:Australia
  • Interests:The Universe, Traveling, Squash, and Scandinavia.

Posted 2009-November-05, 07:02

gwnn, on Nov 5 2009, 11:56 PM, said:

nonexpert 3C, limit+ raise of H

ja...I don't see any other alternative.
- Andy -

We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
0

#4 User is offline   peachy 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,056
  • Joined: 2007-November-19
  • Location:Pacific Time

Posted 2009-November-05, 07:45

I would make the bid that by our system shows my hand. I don't know how it is relevant whether partner is "best" or "worst" or "average". 3C = limit or better raise in hearts.
0

#5 User is offline   billw55 

  • enigmatic
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,757
  • Joined: 2009-July-31
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2009-November-05, 07:57

I guess 4♥. Both vul, make them decide to save or not before they can communicate.
Life is long and beautiful, if bad things happen, good things will follow.
-gwnn
0

#6 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2009-November-05, 08:20

I would bid 6 heart if I had just one bid avaiable, so I think 4 heart is terrible.
But luckily I can bid 3♣ to show this hand.
I will make one more try if partners signs off.
Kind Regards

Roland

Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#7 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2009-November-05, 08:35

agree with roland, this hand screams slam
BridgeGod: my personal website with interactive problems and articles
0

#8 User is offline   suokko 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 289
  • Joined: 2005-October-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Helsinki (Finland)
  • Interests:*dreaming*

Posted 2009-November-05, 09:10

Codo, on Nov 5 2009, 04:20 PM, said:

I would bid 6 heart if I had just one bid avaiable, so I think 4 heart is terrible.
But luckily I can bid 3♣ to show this hand.
I will make one more try if partners signs off.

What about 5♥? Is that terrible choice too?

None seems to think about it but it has two good points for it.
1. It is pre-emptive when we have quite good fit.
2. We want partner to have good ♥ for slam so we could just ask about them.

PS. I would still make milder slam try using 3♣
0

#9 User is offline   pooltuna 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,814
  • Joined: 2009-July-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Orleans

Posted 2009-November-05, 09:25

Codo, on Nov 5 2009, 09:20 AM, said:

I would bid 6 heart if I had just one bid avaiable, so I think 4 heart is terrible.
But luckily I can bid 3♣ to show this hand.
I will make one more try if partners signs off.

How would 3♣ be different than X followed by #♣
"Tell me of your home world, Usul"
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"

"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."

George Bernard Shaw
0

#10 User is offline   Jlall 

  • Follower of 655321
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,293
  • Joined: 2008-December-05
  • Interests:drinking, women, bridge...what else?

Posted 2009-November-05, 11:15

Totally depends on your system. I use whatever shows a strong heart raise.
0

#11 User is offline   OleBerg 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,950
  • Joined: 2008-April-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Copenhagen
  • Interests:Model-Railways.

Posted 2009-November-06, 02:47

In Denmark 3♦ is standard for showing a F1-heart-raise.

I like it; Saves space when we haven't found a fit. (3♣ = spades, F1 or GF accordibg to agreement.)

Edit: And it is a completely obvious bid.
_____________________________________

Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.

Best Regards Ole Berg

_____________________________________

We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:

- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.

Gnasher
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users