BBO Discussion Forums: ReNegetive Double - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

ReNegetive Double What does it show

#21 User is offline   ONEferBRID 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 835
  • Joined: 2009-May-03

Posted 2009-October-26, 07:46

My thoughts, and from what I know about Opener's DBL here, afirms Ken's definition that the Re-Negative Double is by Opener AFTER Responder has made a Negative DBL.
For the given auction:

1C - 1S - neg X( showing ) - 2S
??
re-neg X = denies 4 but suggests 3
3H = competitive, 4 support
4H = competitive, 4 support

( good/bad 2NT is in play here for the 3C/3D bids and probably
the 3H bid )
3S! would be a stop-ask

Partner most likely has shortage and with your shortage, game looks like a good bet.
You might even entertain a 4! jump-reverse splinter.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Re the following auction ( Ken's example at the end):

1m - (1 or 2om ) - neg X - ( 3om )
??
re-neg X = both majors
3M = competitive, denies 4 cards oM )
Don Stenmark ( TWOferBRIDGE )
0

#22 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,093
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2009-October-26, 09:11

gnasher, on Oct 25 2009, 05:32 PM, said:

aguahombre, on Oct 25 2009, 08:31 PM, said:

It does work, if the 2NT bid shows a heart fit (good or bad, ur choice).

I don't usually quibble about terminology, and I know that nomenclature varies across the world, but I've never heard anyone use the term "good-bad 2NT" to mean a 2NT bid that shows a raise. It's possible that that's what Phil meant, but I rather doubt it.

Also, in the first line of the post of mine that you quoted you'll find the sentence "I use 2NT by opener as a good 3 bid", so I'm not quite sure who you think you're disagreeing with.

That's correct.

However, I do find it rather restrictive to play 2N as specifically a heart raise. I don't like the idea of getting shut out with an opener that wants to compete with a club suit and LHO doesn't always re-raise.

If I opened 1, then I'd be shutting out two other strains in order to show a good heart hand with 2N.
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#23 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2009-October-26, 10:02

Phil, on Oct 26 2009, 04:11 PM, said:

However, I do find it rather restrictive to play 2N as specifically a heart raise. I don't like the idea of getting shut out with an opener that wants to compete with a club suit and LHO doesn't always re-raise.

So bid 3 with the competitive hand, and accept that if you have a good hand with clubs you'll have to do something imperfect.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#24 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2009-October-26, 10:03

gnasher, on Oct 26 2009, 11:02 AM, said:

Phil, on Oct 26 2009, 04:11 PM, said:

However, I do find it rather restrictive to play 2N as specifically a heart raise. I don't like the idea of getting shut out with an opener that wants to compete with a club suit and LHO doesn't always re-raise.

So bid 3 with the competitive hand, and accept that if you have a good hand with clubs you'll have to do something imperfect.

like 3s
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#25 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2009-October-26, 10:07

jmcw, on Oct 26 2009, 01:30 PM, said:

Thanks for the posts to date. Is there a consensus here?

No, I wouldn't say that there is.

Quote

DBL = Solid opener likely 3 card support
2NT = Minimum or Good opening with 4 card support
3= Solid opener with 4 card support

Did I get it right?
If so, 2NT does not solve the problem with this hand. Responder will sign off in 3 fearing the minimum raise.

Splitting it three ways is quite sensible. If you do that, the strongest meaning has to be a hand that will bid again, so you should use 2NT as either a minimum or a game-force.

With this hand I'd still want to be in game, but if you think it's too weak for that you should show the middle range.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#26 User is offline   pirate22 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 638
  • Joined: 2008-November-06
  • Location:asia at present time now HK time
  • Interests:Bridge- scuba-natural sex,no porn:)<br> Associate member I.B.P.A. workaholic

Posted 2009-October-26, 10:52

negative x's when partner opens 1 any opps come in as given original hand.

try this I play and split up the negative x to give pard a combined point count of our hands

so 1cl-1sp x now = 8-11 points-any shape
1n/t now=12-14 with stop
2sp now =12-14 no stop
2n/t now = 15 points (can have stop/no stop(await pards rebid)
same applies if pard opens 1d(but i play min 4 card suit)
" " " " 1h or 1sp and opps come in 2 minor or 1sp over pards 1ht.

at least partner who opens say 11/12/13/14/15 points,knows the combined point count,of our hands
Small point 1cl-1sp 2cl/2d/2ht/2sp shows less than 8 points and is competing

regards
0

#27 User is offline   nigel_k 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,207
  • Joined: 2009-April-26
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellington, NZ

Posted 2009-October-26, 13:03

Dunno if this is standard but I would treat the negative double as just showing hearts and would bid the same as after 1-(P)-1-(2), not using any special treatment due to the negative double. With four card 'support' I would always raise not double.

If the negative double might not have hearts we are talking about a completely different problem so we need to know which it is. Anyway in that case I would still bid hearts as a 4-3 looks better than NT.
0

#28 User is offline   skjaeran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,727
  • Joined: 2006-June-05
  • Location:Oslo, Norway
  • Interests:Bridge, sports, Sci-fi, fantasy

Posted 2009-October-27, 13:57

I'd just bid game. It might be a slight overbid, but so be it. Where I play, I'd expect the majority of the field to bid game.
Kind regards,
Harald
0

#29 User is offline   pirate22 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 638
  • Joined: 2008-November-06
  • Location:asia at present time now HK time
  • Interests:Bridge- scuba-natural sex,no porn:)<br> Associate member I.B.P.A. workaholic

Posted 2009-October-31, 02:28

having opened 1cl and opps come in 1sp what does pards x mean ? lets presume values/or maybe a ht suit--------using my form of negative x, it would show 8-11 points any shape-now 2 spades comes in---what does the 1cl know?that the partnership has min 22/25 points,so what is our game in n/t or a suit contract,to show my pard i have a good opener i bid ,now x(regenerative x)if less than 14 i bid 3 hts and if pard now bids 3n/t, he has spade stop and probably not a ht suit,if this not the case he will bid 4 hts-and your dcision now is pass---may go 1 off but nothing lost,
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users