ReNegetive Double What does it show
#21
Posted 2009-October-26, 07:46
For the given auction:
1C - 1S - neg X( showing ♥) - 2S
??
re-neg X = denies 4♥ but suggests 3♥
3H = competitive, 4♥ support
4H = competitive, 4♥ support
( good/bad 2NT is in play here for the 3C/3D bids and probably
the 3H bid )
3S! would be a stop-ask
Partner most likely has ♠ shortage and with your ♦ shortage, game looks like a good bet.
You might even entertain a 4♦! jump-reverse splinter.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Re the following auction ( Ken's example at the end):
1m - (1 or 2om ) - neg X - ( 3om )
??
re-neg X = both majors
3M = competitive, denies 4 cards oM )
#22
Posted 2009-October-26, 09:11
gnasher, on Oct 25 2009, 05:32 PM, said:
aguahombre, on Oct 25 2009, 08:31 PM, said:
I don't usually quibble about terminology, and I know that nomenclature varies across the world, but I've never heard anyone use the term "good-bad 2NT" to mean a 2NT bid that shows a raise. It's possible that that's what Phil meant, but I rather doubt it.
Also, in the first line of the post of mine that you quoted you'll find the sentence "I use 2NT by opener as a good 3♥ bid", so I'm not quite sure who you think you're disagreeing with.
That's correct.
However, I do find it rather restrictive to play 2N as specifically a heart raise. I don't like the idea of getting shut out with an opener that wants to compete with a club suit and LHO doesn't always re-raise.
If I opened 1♦, then I'd be shutting out two other strains in order to show a good heart hand with 2N.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#23
Posted 2009-October-26, 10:02
Phil, on Oct 26 2009, 04:11 PM, said:
So bid 3♣ with the competitive hand, and accept that if you have a good hand with clubs you'll have to do something imperfect.
#24
Posted 2009-October-26, 10:03
gnasher, on Oct 26 2009, 11:02 AM, said:
Phil, on Oct 26 2009, 04:11 PM, said:
So bid 3♣ with the competitive hand, and accept that if you have a good hand with clubs you'll have to do something imperfect.
like 3s
#25
Posted 2009-October-26, 10:07
jmcw, on Oct 26 2009, 01:30 PM, said:
No, I wouldn't say that there is.
Quote
2NT = Minimum or Good opening with 4 card support
3♥= Solid opener with 4 card support
Did I get it right?
If so, 2NT does not solve the problem with this hand. Responder will sign off in 3♥ fearing the minimum raise.
Splitting it three ways is quite sensible. If you do that, the strongest meaning has to be a hand that will bid again, so you should use 2NT as either a minimum or a game-force.
With this hand I'd still want to be in game, but if you think it's too weak for that you should show the middle range.
#26
Posted 2009-October-26, 10:52
try this I play and split up the negative x to give pard a combined point count of our hands
so 1cl-1sp x now = 8-11 points-any shape
1n/t now=12-14 with stop
2sp now =12-14 no stop
2n/t now = 15 points (can have stop/no stop(await pards rebid)
same applies if pard opens 1d(but i play min 4 card suit)
" " " " 1h or 1sp and opps come in 2 minor or 1sp over pards 1ht.
at least partner who opens say 11/12/13/14/15 points,knows the combined point count,of our hands
Small point 1cl-1sp 2cl/2d/2ht/2sp shows less than 8 points and is competing
regards
#27
Posted 2009-October-26, 13:03
If the negative double might not have hearts we are talking about a completely different problem so we need to know which it is. Anyway in that case I would still bid hearts as a 4-3 looks better than NT.
#28
Posted 2009-October-27, 13:57
Harald
#29
Posted 2009-October-31, 02:28

Help
