Posted 2009-October-03, 03:36
Yes, that is one of the problems in a 2/1 auction especially when they are 16 opposite 16 or alike without a fit. However on this hand, I'm not particularly interested in inviting in NT because we have found a club fit. Partner doesn't even need that good of a hand (your example one) like AQxxx Ax xx Qxxx and if clubs and spades behave then 6♣ is good.
On your auction I would bid 4♠ over 3NT most likely suggesting HH in spades and an invite to slam. That way partner can judge whether to play in 4♠ on a 5-2 fit, 5♣, or a slam. I don't want to bid 4♦ as a 'cue' because that may be construed as a 5-6 shape nor do I want to bid 4♥ as that would suggest 1345 or 0346 inviting slam. So out of 4♣, 4♠ and 4NT I think 4♠ is good. I don't think it is "placing the contract" since with 3 card support I would've bid 3♠ over 3♣.
What would 3♦ over 2♣ by partner have been? If it's a splinter then partner's most likely shape is 5224 and 4♠ should be just as good or better contract than 4NT so I think if partner bids 4NT over 4♠ it's keycard. However, that's a violation to one of my meta agreements where if 3NT is bid to play then a follow up of 4NT is to play as well but in this case if opener has a min we can play in 4♠ or 5♣ giving up on 4NT.
- Andy -
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.