*Gambling 3NT, expect a running seven or eight card minor and no more than an outside queen. Responses: 4/5♣ are pass or correct, no more detailed discussion.
Gambling 3NT
#1
Posted 2009-September-25, 06:55
*Gambling 3NT, expect a running seven or eight card minor and no more than an outside queen. Responses: 4/5♣ are pass or correct, no more detailed discussion.
#2
Posted 2009-September-25, 07:10
So, they will catch at least 6 tricks in the majors before you can start to take your minor tricks.
So 4 Club is clear cut.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#3
Posted 2009-September-25, 07:21
Against good opps it's better to bid 4♣ before they double 3NT. Running soon gives them less options than running late.
#4
Posted 2009-September-25, 08:29
#5
Posted 2009-September-25, 08:58
1. 5♦ rates to be a good save if partner has 2-3 clubs, but I'm not sure I can discover this. Its more likely he has 0-1 looking at my hand. On the other hand, I don't mind defending 4 of a major if pard does have 0-1 clubs. We should be able to take 2 clubs, one diamond (maybe 2) and have a good shot at a trump promotion for the 4th.
2. What is harder to defend against? A 3N opening or a 4♣ pass or correct call? It should not matter against good opponents, but I have seen average club players have a tough time over 3N. Be careful what you wish for however. At some other tables, pard's hand might be opened with 3♦ and the opponents will not find their 20 point game, so even if it goes 3N swish, we rate to give up at least 200 in 3N (especially since my hand is on the table). So I would bid 4♣.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#6
Posted 2009-September-25, 09:00
Codo, on Sep 25 2009, 08:10 AM, said:
So, they will catch at least 6 tricks in the majors before you can start to take your minor tricks.
So 4 Club is clear cut.
yep! can't say it any better than this. Running is clear however does bidding 4♦ suggest a ♣ lead is viable?
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#7
Posted 2009-September-25, 09:47
#8
Posted 2009-September-25, 10:39
#9
Posted 2009-September-25, 10:41
#10
Posted 2009-September-25, 10:48
jdonn, on Sep 25 2009, 11:41 AM, said:
To add to that, there isn't any benefit to bidding 4♦ instead of 4♣ here. Partner will correct 4♣ to 4♦ always, and you know partner's suit isn't clubs. The only possible reason to use 4♦ as p/c is to protect a tenace, but with a hand like this, not only is there no reason to want to protect your holdings, but often it is better to have partner declaring on hands like this, so the opponents at least have to guess partner's major lengths. The better use of 4♦ is to ask for Shortness as Josh said, which can be crucial on slam-going hands.
#11
Posted 2009-September-27, 16:26
On the actual hand, you wouldn't expect to make and the likelihood of them making 4♥ is not great enough that you feel happy passing and conceding a number of 50s. Though 4♦ probably won't make either. If it was IMPs I would pass nonvul and might consider passing all vul as well.
#12
Posted 2009-September-27, 18:45
#13
Posted 2009-September-28, 05:02
4D, and even if 4D goes down, it will go down less than 3NT.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#14
Posted 2009-September-28, 10:30
I thought the normal thing to do was to pass only if 3NT has a good chance of making, otherwise bid 4♣ (unless making a try for another game or a slam). It looks very likely to me that five or more major suit tricks will be cashed before we get a look in.
I'm glad to see that the poll backs me up.
#15
Posted 2009-September-28, 11:52
#16
Posted 2009-September-28, 14:38
of course partner will have Qx, Qxx, AKQ10xxx, x once in a blue moon and I'll look silly.
4♦ is definitely a shortage ask in my book.

Help

3NT* (P) ?