BBO Discussion Forums: Do you have an agreement - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Do you have an agreement

Poll: 1D (4C) X (P); 4NT (33 member(s) have cast votes)

1D (4C) X (P); 4NT

  1. Natural (19 votes [57.58%])

    Percentage of vote: 57.58%

  2. Blackwood (5 votes [15.15%])

    Percentage of vote: 15.15%

  3. Something Else (9 votes [27.27%])

    Percentage of vote: 27.27%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   Cascade 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Yellows
  • Posts: 6,772
  • Joined: 2003-July-22
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Zealand
  • Interests:Juggling, Unicycling

Posted 2009-August-13, 03:17

What is your agreement here?

Or what is the default?
Wayne Burrows

I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon

#2 User is offline   mich-b 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 584
  • Joined: 2008-November-27

Posted 2009-August-13, 03:57

Possible meaning for 4NT in competition:

1st priority : takeout showing 2 places to play. Cannot logically aply here (would have applied if they overcalled 4M)

2nd priority : natural (only if we bid 3NT earlier - does not apply here)

So we are left with
3rd priority: Blackwood.
0

#3 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2009-August-13, 04:15

definitely sounds like natural to me

Kx
QJx
AKQJxxx
A
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#4 User is offline   cherdanno 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,640
  • Joined: 2009-February-16

Posted 2009-August-13, 04:21

gwnn, on Aug 13 2009, 05:15 AM, said:

definitely sounds like natural to me

Kx
QJx
AKQJxxx
A

That hand is too strong - this looks like a slam force to me over a takeout double at the 4-level - but I agree about the hand type.

I never play Blackwood so since we don't have an agreed suit that removes one option, and two-suited takeout doesn't make sense here.
"Are you saying that LTC merits a more respectful dismissal?"
0

#5 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2009-August-13, 04:22

right Arend didn't look at the hand after I posted it.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#6 User is offline   OleBerg 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,950
  • Joined: 2008-April-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Copenhagen
  • Interests:Model-Railways.

Posted 2009-August-13, 04:24

Voted "Something else", without really knowing what. best guess would be a good 5 hand.
_____________________________________

Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.

Best Regards Ole Berg

_____________________________________

We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:

- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.


Gnasher
0

#7 User is offline   rd6789 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 98
  • Joined: 2009-August-03

Posted 2009-August-13, 05:19

to play - lots of diamonds and the AC

rather go for 10 tricks than 11

4NT also a slam try if partner has tops in the majors
richard
0

#8 User is offline   peachy 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,056
  • Joined: 2007-November-19
  • Location:Pacific Time

Posted 2009-August-13, 05:21

What is the agreement on the X? I assume "cards" or "negativ/ish" with defensive tricks potential.
If it was "cards" then 4NT could logically be an offensive hand with good long diamonds, a club stopper, and no 4-card majors. I dunno... I don't have agreement, but I do play X as *negative but with values suited for defense as well as offense*.
If it was "penalty", then 4NT can only be slam investigation, thus plain Blackwood since no suit agreement exists.
0

#9 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,397
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Odense, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2009-August-13, 06:21

If it's natural then all slam tries start with 5. One-suited, two-suited with hearts, two-suited with spades, and three-suited. I suppose that's playable but slam exploration could be made more accurate by assigning some funny meaning to 4NT. Then again, it is probably not something that is worth discussing and natural is easy to remember.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#10 User is offline   benlessard 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,465
  • Joined: 2006-January-07
  • Location:Montreal Canada
  • Interests:All games. i really mean all of them.

Posted 2009-August-13, 20:50

RKC for D.

Sure 4Nt as natural make sense but having a RKC available take precedence.

In Meckstroth book they have a similar bidding sequencew where Rodwell bid 4Nt thinking its RKC and Meck pass thinking its natural.

So i guess this mean both meaning make sense and you do well to discuss it.
From Psych "I mean, Gus and I never see eye-to-eye on work stuff.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
0

#11 User is offline   skjaeran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,727
  • Joined: 2006-June-05
  • Location:Oslo, Norway
  • Interests:Bridge, sports, Sci-fi, fantasy

Posted 2009-August-14, 12:09

Natural for me.
Kind regards,
Harald
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users