Do you act?
#1
Posted 2009-August-10, 13:59
w/w imps, starting with pard:
P 1H 2C 2S
P 3S 4C 4S
P P ?
Do you agree with your previous bidding? What now?
#2
Posted 2009-August-10, 14:32
It's probably not lead directing though I'm happy if partner thinks it is. Pass would be ok but I think they will go down 2-3 tricks more often than they make. Partner would almost certainly have bid 5♣ when we belong there and sometimes when we don't.
The previous bidding is fine.
#3
Posted 2009-August-10, 14:35
#4
Posted 2009-August-10, 15:22
Pass now, unclear that double would even ask for a heart lead, and it might not be necessary given how much length he's marked with. Moreover, that's still only three tricks.
#5
Posted 2009-August-10, 15:31
#6
Posted 2009-August-10, 15:34
Should show something like this.
Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.
Best Regards Ole Berg
_____________________________________
We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:
- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.
Gnasher
#7
Posted 2009-August-10, 15:40
Echognome, on Aug 10 2009, 04:31 PM, said:
That was my first reaction too, but partner will look at many hearts, a few spades, and saw us making two non-forcing bids before we doubled 4S. I think he will work out why we think we can beat this.
#8
Posted 2009-August-10, 15:42
But I didn't want to assume any such agreements.
Note that I understand people are saying that double is just a strange enough bid that partner will work out what we think it means.
#9
Posted 2009-August-10, 16:17
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#10
Posted 2009-August-10, 18:26
1. There is no guarantee that a heart lead will be the setting trick. We could easily be ruffing declarer's natural losers in the suit.
2. As far as I can see, a diamond lead could be equally effective. If partner is really weak, this could be the only time he gets to lead thru dummy's strength
3. My biggest worry is that opponents can redouble. 4Sxx = is not a nice score compared to 4S +1 at the other table
#11
Posted 2009-August-10, 20:08
#12
Posted 2009-August-11, 00:43
Now I pass. Without agreements, It's not clear that double is lead directing. I'd double with 0247 to suggest further competition.
#14
Posted 2009-August-11, 03:29
#15
Posted 2009-August-11, 04:21
#16
Posted 2009-August-11, 04:48
You dont double at imps hoping for -1.
On this bidding its impossible that the X show a hand that is hoping for -2.
I slightly prefer X to bidding 5C, but i would never just pass.
If you dont plan to X then you should have bid 5C not 4.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#17
Posted 2009-August-11, 08:26
Jlall, on Aug 10 2009, 02:59 PM, said:
w/w imps, starting with pard:
P 1H 2C 2S
P 3S 4C 4S
P P ?
Do you agree with your previous bidding? What now?
With a passed partner our chances for game are relatively low so I might have started with 4♣ to maximize the opps guessing. I am passing and hope I figure out which ♣ is best to lead
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#18
Posted 2009-August-11, 13:13
pooltuna, on Aug 11 2009, 04:26 PM, said:
Jlall, on Aug 10 2009, 02:59 PM, said:
w/w imps, starting with pard:
P 1H 2C 2S
P 3S 4C 4S
P P ?
Do you agree with your previous bidding? What now?
With a passed partner our chances for game are relatively low so I might have started with 4♣ to maximize the opps guessing. I am passing and hope I figure out which ♣ is best to lead
LHO bid spades first, you're partner is on lead.
I'm doubling now, my partners make good leads.
Harald
#19
Posted 2009-August-11, 13:16
On this day you get lucky and beat them 3, partner having a stiff club and clubs 2-2.
#20
Posted 2009-August-11, 17:19
Jlall, on Aug 10 2009, 02:59 PM, said:
w/w imps, starting with pard:
P 1H 2C 2S
P 3S 4C 4S
P P ?
Do you agree with your previous bidding? What now?
- Agree with previous bidding 2♣ = 10, _X = 9, 5♣ = 8
- Now, _X =10, 5♣ = 4. Partner is likely to read your message even if you haven't agreed Lightner doubles of games.

Help
