Page 1 of 1
opps bid too much
#1
Posted 2009-July-26, 23:35
p-p-1♠-2♦
2♠-x-3♠-p
p-??
Neither vulnerable MP's.
Oh and your hand is
x
J9xxx
Qx
AKTxx
Partner might be light.
2♠-x-3♠-p
p-??
Neither vulnerable MP's.
Oh and your hand is
x
J9xxx
Qx
AKTxx
Partner might be light.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
#3
Posted 2009-July-27, 05:35
This hand screams -730, ♦Q is useless on defence if partner has a club fit you are toasted.
I would auto double opposite a normal 2♦ overcall. If partner is often light I like 4♦ now.
I would auto double opposite a normal 2♦ overcall. If partner is often light I like 4♦ now.
#4
Posted 2009-July-27, 05:45
Didn't you describe your hand already? I think you did. That means partner has made the decision to defend 3♠ undoubled, unless you have something new to add. You don't have abnything new to add, therefore you respect partner's decision and pass.
Rik
Rik
I want my opponents to leave my table with a smile on their face and without matchpoints on their score card - in that order.
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
#5
Posted 2009-July-27, 05:56
I storngly disagree with the fact that you have shown your hand already. Wouldn't you dbl with a 2432 and 8HCP ? I would. This hand is golden, moreover your passed 1st so your partner exactly know what to expect.
Maybe -730 but .... Partner does not have to pass.
Well, it is matchpoint after all, ***** happens.
-140 wont be a good score with this hand, I can promise you.
Maybe -730 but .... Partner does not have to pass.
Well, it is matchpoint after all, ***** happens.
-140 wont be a good score with this hand, I can promise you.
#6
Posted 2009-July-27, 07:59
-140 is no good score, but + 50 is better then -100/-200.
We have around half of the deck, no established great fit.
I would like to show this hand by double, but I do not want him to sit and I do not want him to run.
So I pass too.
We have around half of the deck, no established great fit.
I would like to show this hand by double, but I do not want him to sit and I do not want him to run.
So I pass too.
Kind Regards
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#7
Posted 2009-July-27, 08:24
Pass.
Do we have a certain plus score? Given that p may be light,
the answer to "certain" is no.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Do we have a certain plus score? Given that p may be light,
the answer to "certain" is no.
With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#8
Posted 2009-July-27, 08:50
cRi cRi, on Jul 27 2009, 06:56 AM, said:
I storngly disagree with the fact that you have shown your hand already. Wouldn't you dbl with a 2432 and 8HCP ? I would.
(I assume you meant 2434.
I wouldn't double with a 2434 8 count. That is why I think I have described my hand.
With a 2434 8 count, I would bid 3♦. With a 2425 8 count, I might double and I might pass. With a 2524 8 count, I would usually double, but not always. (Take the given hand and change the ♣K into the ♠J to get ♠Jx ♥J9xxx ♦Qx ♣ATxx and I would pass.)
Is the actual hand very different from a good 2425 8 count? I don't think so.
Rik
I want my opponents to leave my table with a smile on their face and without matchpoints on their score card - in that order.
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
#9
Posted 2009-July-27, 09:00
Well, maybe I am wrong then. But I would dbl any 2434 8 count, And there in no way I let 3♠ being non vul with this hand. Too many ways to win imho.
The 3 situations I can see where bidding is wrong is :
A - partner passes and it makes
B - Partner bids, 3♠ was down and we go down at the 4 level
C - Partner bids, we go for 2 down AND we got dbled.
I trust partner judgment, and If A happens quite often, B should very rarely happen and vice versa. I dont mean I trust partner to bid perfectly not know everything, just that I think if he tends to pass often, he will not bid when pass is the right action.
Going down 2 with my hand and get doubled is, imo, unlikely.
The 3 situations I can see where bidding is wrong is :
A - partner passes and it makes
B - Partner bids, 3♠ was down and we go down at the 4 level
C - Partner bids, we go for 2 down AND we got dbled.
I trust partner judgment, and If A happens quite often, B should very rarely happen and vice versa. I dont mean I trust partner to bid perfectly not know everything, just that I think if he tends to pass often, he will not bid when pass is the right action.
Going down 2 with my hand and get doubled is, imo, unlikely.
#10
Posted 2009-July-27, 13:06
I'm sort of pleasantly surprised that no one has suggested opening with this hand (yet). I wouldn't - but only because I can't stand a 2♦ response.
Agree with passing now.
Agree with passing now.
Not an expert, just a student of the game
Page 1 of 1

Help
