Help
My new partner's opening lead was the J from club holding of QJx. I know that some players lead that way, but I also know that most, or so I think:), naturally lead the Q. Isn't leading the Q standard unless there is an understanding between the partners? We scored badly due to my confusion on the lead.
Page 1 of 1
Leading from QJx A question about leads.
#2
- Follower of 655321
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 3,293
- Joined: 2008-December-05
- Interests:drinking, women, bridge...what else?
Posted 2009-July-09, 21:02
Yes leading the queen is standard.
#3
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 6,373
- Joined: 2003-March-15
- Location:Hamburg, Germany
- Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball
Posted 2009-July-10, 00:20
There are three reasons to lead the jack:
1. You have agreed on some non standard leads like "Journalist leads".
2. You want to be funny and confuse partner and/or declarer.
3. You have no idea of the game.
So your partner was somewhere between 2 and 3, I guess the latest.
1. You have agreed on some non standard leads like "Journalist leads".
2. You want to be funny and confuse partner and/or declarer.
3. You have no idea of the game.
So your partner was somewhere between 2 and 3, I guess the latest.
Kind Regards
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#4
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 7,786
- Joined: 2004-September-05
- Gender:Male
- Location:Galloway NJ USA
-
Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.
Posted 2009-July-10, 09:56
Q is standard. J is Rusinow (Journalist) or tricky or random.
In the absence of a specific agreement, you would expect that the lead of the J would deny the Q.
In the absence of a specific agreement, you would expect that the lead of the J would deny the Q.
#5
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 13,654
- Joined: 2005-June-15
- Gender:Male
- Location:Canada
- Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.
Posted 2009-July-10, 13:53
ArtK78, on Jul 10 2009, 10:56 AM, said:
Q is standard. J is Rusinow (Journalist) or tricky or random.
In the absence of a specific agreement, you would expect that the lead of the J would deny the Q.
In the absence of a specific agreement, you would expect that the lead of the J would deny the Q.
Are you sure? I'm too lazy to look it up, but I think rusinow and journalist are different... I think journalist is the jack denies a higher honour, while the 9/10 promise 0 or 2 higher (so J from J109..., 10 from KJ10....), while rusinow is the 2nd highest honour in a touching sequence, unless doubleton... J from QJx and Q from QJ tight.
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
#6
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 10,093
- Joined: 2008-December-11
- Gender:Male
- Location:North Texas, USA
- Interests:Mountain Biking
Posted 2009-July-10, 14:34
mikeh, on Jul 10 2009, 02:53 PM, said:
ArtK78, on Jul 10 2009, 10:56 AM, said:
Q is standard. J is Rusinow (Journalist) or tricky or random.
In the absence of a specific agreement, you would expect that the lead of the J would deny the Q.
In the absence of a specific agreement, you would expect that the lead of the J would deny the Q.
Are you sure? I'm too lazy to look it up, but I think rusinow and journalist are different... I think journalist is the jack denies a higher honour, while the 9/10 promise 0 or 2 higher (so J from J109..., 10 from KJ10....), while rusinow is the 2nd highest honour in a touching sequence, unless doubleton... J from QJx and Q from QJ tight.
Mike's right.
I don't need to look it up
Hi y'all!
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#7
- Follower of 655321
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 3,293
- Joined: 2008-December-05
- Interests:drinking, women, bridge...what else?
Posted 2009-July-10, 15:07
Journalist leads vs suits are basically rusinow (J from QJx). The more commonly known journalist leads are vs NT (jack denies).
#8
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 7,786
- Joined: 2004-September-05
- Gender:Male
- Location:Galloway NJ USA
-
Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.
Posted 2009-July-10, 15:08
mikeh, on Jul 10 2009, 02:53 PM, said:
ArtK78, on Jul 10 2009, 10:56 AM, said:
Q is standard. J is Rusinow (Journalist) or tricky or random.
In the absence of a specific agreement, you would expect that the lead of the J would deny the Q.
In the absence of a specific agreement, you would expect that the lead of the J would deny the Q.
Are you sure? I'm too lazy to look it up, but I think rusinow and journalist are different... I think journalist is the jack denies a higher honour, while the 9/10 promise 0 or 2 higher (so J from J109..., 10 from KJ10....), while rusinow is the 2nd highest honour in a touching sequence, unless doubleton... J from QJx and Q from QJ tight.
Perhaps it depends on whether the contract is a suit or no trump. It was my understanding that Rusinow leads were adopted as part of the Journalist lead structure against suit contracts, but not against no trump contracts.
But I could be wrong about that.
In any event, the lead of the J from QJx is clearly a Rusinow lead.
Today, some players lead Rusinow against no trump contracts. So I guess anything is possible.
#9
- Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 9,586
- Joined: 2005-September-21
- Gender:Male
- Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
- Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor
Posted 2009-July-10, 16:15
Partner wanted to lead the suit but was deathly afraid of Dummy having A10x or K10x. So, he got tricky. Just my opinion.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.
-P.J. Painter.
Page 1 of 1