BBO Discussion Forums: Defense to Michaels - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Defense to Michaels

Poll: Your bid? (17 member(s) have cast votes)

Your bid?

  1. Pass (1 votes [5.88%])

    Percentage of vote: 5.88%

  2. X (11 votes [64.71%])

    Percentage of vote: 64.71%

  3. 2D (2 votes [11.76%])

    Percentage of vote: 11.76%

  4. 2N (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  5. 3C (1 votes [5.88%])

    Percentage of vote: 5.88%

  6. Something else (2 votes [11.76%])

    Percentage of vote: 11.76%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   nick_s 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 170
  • Joined: 2007-December-06
  • Location:Chicago, IL

Posted 2009-May-02, 16:03

Scoring: MP

Pass - (Pass) - 1C - (2C) -
??


You play a 12-14 NT at this vulnerability, so 1C is clubs or a strong NT. 2 is Michaels.

If you pass or X, LHO bids 2 which comes back around to you. Now what?
Not an expert, just a student of the game
0

#2 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,094
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2009-May-02, 18:19

Over Michaels you can play that 2M is a stopper. Or you can play unusual/unusual. Double is usually penalty in one of their suits.

A delayed double is typically cooperative, denoting some sort of balanced hand.
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#3 User is offline   rogerclee 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,214
  • Joined: 2007-December-16
  • Location:Pasadena, CA

Posted 2009-May-02, 18:30

I would double first, which I play is mostly card-showing, though all of our subsequent doubles are penalty oriented.

Given that partner doesn't want to play 2x, it seems clear to bid 3, having already shown values.
0

#4 User is offline   inquiry 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 14,566
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amelia Island, FL
  • Interests:Bridge, what else?

Posted 2009-May-02, 22:01

I double

Consider playing Garozzo 2/3 Doubles.

We can give Benito the credit for the method, but our own frequent poster Glen (ashton) describes this convention well on his page...see

http://www.bridgemat...com/victory.htm


What you do here, is double the cue-bid, assume first LHO bids a major. Partner will double with 2 or 3 cards in that suit, and pass with 1 or 4 (and bid with a void). If LHO and partner passes, and RHO bids a major, you double to show 2/3 in the suit (if you had more, you would pass and await partners double).
--Ben--

#5 User is offline   mich-b 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 584
  • Joined: 2008-November-27

Posted 2009-May-03, 01:26

Double , showing some useful values.

On the 2nd round I like 3 , especially in your system, because either we have a fit , or pd with strong NT will bid again.
0

#6 User is offline   TMorris 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 322
  • Joined: 2008-May-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, England

Posted 2009-May-03, 08:19

2 showing an invitational hand with 3 card support in
0

#7 User is online   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,124
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2009-May-03, 09:04

Hi,

X, seems clear.

Now the only open issue is, did the X create a forcing pass
sitiuation, at least on the 2 level?
I would say yes, but since I am a passed hand, this is not
100% clear cut.

If the X did create a forcing pass, than partners pass showed
a semi bal. hand. => I would make X, if 2S comes back.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users