BBO Discussion Forums: n d o - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

n d o

#1 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2009-May-02, 08:09

Scoring: MP

p-1♥-x-1♠
2♦-2♥-3♦-end


W leads:

A♠-x-x-x (looks like spades are 3-4)
A♥-x-K-x
x♥-x-Q-x
x♠-x-K-x (again RHO leads like spades are 3-4)
x♥-x-♦9-♦K

now what?
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#2 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2009-May-02, 09:54

I play diamonds from the top. 3622-4233 is a priori more likely than 3631-4225. Furthermore, with a singleton club West might have switched to it.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users