BBO Discussion Forums: atb - error count - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

atb - error count insanity all around

#1 User is offline   Mbodell 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,871
  • Joined: 2007-April-22
  • Location:Santa Clara, CA

Posted 2009-April-28, 00:10

Playing in a charity unit IMP pair game yesterday the following hand happened. My partner and I, and even our opponents, normally play better than this hand - I swear. But in the spirit of the insanity and error count I thought I'd share a hilariously poorly bid/played/defended hand from yesterday that only swung 18 IMPs (hand rotated).

Scoring: XIMP

P - 1 - 1
2 - P - 2 - P
2 - P - 4 - P
4nt - P - 5 - P
5 - P - [6he]


T1 5 A 2 6
West now leads 4 out of turn. Director! Lead not accepted.

T2 3 K A 8
T3 2 (5+7 both played by West) A 3
5 stays as part of trick 3, 7 becomes West's second penalty card

T4 7 6 9 T
South demands West lead 4

T5 4 J 8 7
T6 3 T 2 7
T7 Q 7 T J

South claims throwing the KQ9 on the 2 good and K. 6= for +1430.

West then berates East for a minute or two for playing the K at T2.

If ever there was an ATB where the total was more than 100%, I think this might be the hand!
0

#2 User is offline   mtvesuvius 

  • Vesuvius the Violent Volcano
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,216
  • Joined: 2008-December-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tampa-Area, Florida
  • Interests:SLEEPING

Posted 2009-April-28, 16:21

matmat said:

Hmmm...

JLOL said:

LOL

Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
0

#3 User is offline   rbforster 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,611
  • Joined: 2006-March-18

Posted 2009-April-28, 16:29

Mbodell, on Apr 28 2009, 01:10 AM, said:

T1 5 A 2 6
West now leads 4 out of turn. Director! Lead not accepted.

Am I misreading the auction? It looks like West is in fact on lead against 6, so how was it a lead of of turn? Somehow he lead the 4 and then changed his mind and lead the 5 instead?
0

#4 User is offline   hanp 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,987
  • Joined: 2009-February-15

Posted 2009-April-28, 16:30

I dislike 2C, I would have passed.

I dislike 4H, I would have bid 3D, second choice 3H.

6H was terrible.

Apart from the spade 4 the play is good. The postmortem was bad though.

Blame goes to west for playing out of turn and for south bidding terribly. No blame for north's 2C which was not relevant to the accident.
and the result can be plotted on a graph.
0

#5 User is offline   Stephen Tu 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,155
  • Joined: 2003-May-14

Posted 2009-April-28, 16:46

Quote

Am I misreading the auction? It looks like West is in fact on lead against 6♥, so how was it a lead of of turn? Somehow he lead the 4 and then changed his mind and lead the 5 instead?


No, West led the 5. Declarer won the trick with the ace, then west led the 4 despite not having won the previous trick. At least that's how I read the post.

Declarer could of course have hooked the SJ, then hooked the heart and made the contract without any penalty card/lead restriction help.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users