BBO Discussion Forums: A slam I didn't make - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

A slam I didn't make

#1 User is offline   EricK 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,303
  • Joined: 2003-February-14
  • Location:England

Posted 2009-April-20, 18:16

Scoring: MP

1 4NT
5 5NT
6 P

Lead T


The bidding went as shown. Honestly it did. No, really, it did.

How do you play it?
0

#2 User is offline   rogerclee 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,214
  • Joined: 2007-December-16
  • Location:Pasadena, CA

Posted 2009-April-20, 19:45

Finesse, play for a double squeeze while hoping that my opponents don't duck two rounds of spades.

Edit: Oh I thought it was 6N, lol. In 6 I win and play a small spade from dummy.
0

#3 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2009-April-20, 19:49

Believe?

Diamond Ace, ruffing finesse back?

If that works (probably covered), play two top clubs, ending in dummy. If all follow, ruff a diamond. Spade toward King. If that holds, ruff another diamond, enter dummy with the heart King, and pull the last trump. Cash an established diamond (if it is) and then lead spades, claiming.

Somewhere along the line you might end up just reducing stuff out until a possible squeeze, which will either be or not, to increase the chances of the spade 10 dropping out.

There's probably more to this, depending on what happens along the way, but I hate the guess-what-happens cater analyses.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#4 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2009-April-21, 02:10

I'd play for a crossruff. The basic plan is A, knock out the spade, throw a heart on a spade and crossruff.

I have to ruff one card low in one hand or the other. If they return a trump after A, I have to decide immediately which hand to take the low ruff in. A priori, 1=6 diamonds is less likely than 5=2 hearts or 4=3 spades, so I'd probably play to ruff a diamond low. If West has A, that's almost guaranteed to be safe - no one leads a singleton against a slam when they have the entry. If East takes A and plays back a diamond straight away, I might change my mind.

If my third-round spade winner gets ruffed by West, I still have time to try to set up a diamond trick or squeeze West in the reds. For that to work, if they return a heart after winning the ace of spades, I should win in hand.

This post has been edited by gnasher: 2009-April-21, 02:11

... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#5 User is offline   oku 

  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 2009-April-23

Posted 2009-April-23, 03:28

if the opponents' trump distribution is 3-2 (68%), the reverse dummy will always work.
it's simple and easy.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users