1st seat, wtp?
#1
Posted 2009-April-07, 00:35
Bridge should be fun!
#2
Posted 2009-April-07, 00:44
Do unto others as you would have others do unto you.
"Mediocrity knows nothing higher than itself, but talent instantly recognizes genius".
#3
Posted 2009-April-07, 01:03
#4
Posted 2009-April-07, 01:42
#5
Posted 2009-April-07, 03:25
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
#7
Posted 2009-April-07, 10:09
#9
Posted 2009-April-07, 10:42
But like the others, I have no idea why anyone would bid if you can't show the minors.
#10
Posted 2009-April-07, 10:47
Other than that, definite pass. No safety for a diamond preempt, it probably gets partner off to the second (or third) best lead, and it's unilateral when you might very well be reasonably well suited to compete in clubs.
It's got the same plus all preempts have - the opponents might land in the wrong spot -- but it's far outweighed by the minuses.
Call me Desdinova...Eternal Light
C. It's the nexus of the crisis and the origin of storms.
IV: ace 333: pot should be game, idk
e: "Maybe God remembered how cute you were as a carrot."
#11
Posted 2009-April-07, 10:58
#12
Posted 2009-April-07, 11:05
Call me Desdinova...Eternal Light
C. It's the nexus of the crisis and the origin of storms.
IV: ace 333: pot should be game, idk
e: "Maybe God remembered how cute you were as a carrot."
#14
Posted 2009-April-07, 13:15
-P.J. Painter.
#15
Posted 2009-April-07, 13:43
kenrexford, on Apr 7 2009, 02:15 PM, said:
Opening 7♦ could be fun too.
#16
Posted 2009-April-07, 13:48
jdonn, on Apr 7 2009, 02:43 PM, said:
kenrexford, on Apr 7 2009, 02:15 PM, said:
Opening 7♦ could be fun too.
I suppose I should say that opening 2♦ could be fun and could actually work often enough to be worth consideration. If, that is, partner has a sense of humor.
7♦ seems less likely to succeed.
-P.J. Painter.
#17
Posted 2009-April-07, 16:13
1♦ (4♥) 4♠ (X)
P (4nt) AP
Bridge should be fun!
#18
Posted 2009-April-08, 12:47
If you have agreed, that 4Nt showes the minors,
this would be perfect, but this is no BI agreement,
and should not be on the to of your priority list
to add.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#19
Posted 2009-April-08, 13:28
-P.J. Painter.
#20
Posted 2009-April-08, 14:28
kenrexford, on Apr 8 2009, 02:28 PM, said:
That's why he's a "Semi-Pro"

Help

your bid?