How do you play 3D?
#1
Posted 2009-April-03, 10:50
#2
Posted 2009-April-03, 11:18
#3
Posted 2009-April-03, 12:00
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#5
Posted 2009-April-03, 12:12
#6
Posted 2009-April-03, 12:48
#7
Posted 2009-April-03, 13:25
3D is a general force (Don't agree with Vesuvius that partner has to bid 3NT with a stopper, partner should make the most desccriptive bid). 3D followed by pulling 3NT to 4H is a slam try. 3D followed by 4H over 3H does not, it can be some 4234 hand without a stopper. 3D followed by 3S, 4C or 4D over 3H is a slam try. 3D followed by 3NT shows doubt about strain and/or level.
#8
Posted 2009-April-03, 13:42
I'm always in the minority on this one.
#9
Posted 2009-April-03, 14:21
jdonn, on Apr 3 2009, 02:42 PM, said:
I'm always in the minority on this one.
You have company
#10
Posted 2009-April-03, 14:22
p.s. does it really make sense to play transfer advances here and give up a natural 2NT bid?
#11
Posted 2009-April-03, 14:24
Thanks.
#12
Posted 2009-April-03, 15:07
Maybe the hand that sparked this discussion is also interesting. You hold AK9x Qx A10xx KJx. If you play 3D is a raise, what do you bid? If you play it is a generic force and you'd like to bid 3D, partner will bid 3H. What then? Kokish said he'd bid 2NT but let's say you play 2NT is NF so that's not a good idea.
If it matters, you are playing IMPs and you are red against white.
#14
Posted 2009-April-03, 15:47
Playing 3d as a generic force, it seems that 3s over 3h should be a cue for hearts, so I'll do that.
I play it both ways (with different partners).
#15
Posted 2009-April-04, 08:24
It would be more of a problem with a weaker hand and the same shape, where I might not be so happy to hear 4♠.
#16
Posted 2009-April-04, 10:28
gnasher, on Apr 4 2009, 09:24 AM, said:
It would be more of a problem with a weaker hand and the same shape, where I might not be so happy to hear 4♠.
agree with this. advancing on 4 is something i never see discussed but in exchange for the risk of reaching a suboptimal 4-x fit we save some space and avoid some other misdescription, and most importantly here, we get information that addresses the point of the hand, here, to try for slam. here, if we bid 3♦ we dont know if partners possible heart rebid implies better or longer hearts or is just a punt. on some other hand like a really strong 4144 we can't have a good auction to slam in a 4-4 club fit because partners club calls after 3♦ are cue bids.

Help
