BBO Discussion Forums: Play problem from IMP pairs - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Play problem from IMP pairs On the easy side

#1 User is offline   awm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,715
  • Joined: 2005-February-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Zurich, Switzerland

Posted 2009-March-23, 20:50

Scoring: IMP


1(1) - 2(2) - 2(3) - PA
4 - PA - 4NT - PA
5(4) - PA - 7(5) - All Pass

(1) Precision-style; could be short
(2) Natural, five or more diamonds
(3) Natural, forcing
(4) Two without the queen
(5) A bit of an overbid, but north could easily have four on this sequence

West leads the 8, taken in hand with Q. The spades need to behave for the contract to have any hope, so I banged down the A. Both opponents followed, East playing the queen.

Can you find the 100% line?

I misplayed this at the table, but the cards were fairly friendly and my line succeeded anyway. (BTW: I think this is easier than most problems appearing in this forum, but it seems on the tough side for a B/I problem).
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
0

#2 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2009-March-24, 04:10

Don't I have six trumps, two hearts, two diamonds, a diamond ruff, and two clubs?

To make it more interesting, suppose that trumps are 3-1, East having singleton queen. I draw trumps and play three rounds of clubs, ruffing. If West has four clubs, I play a double squeeze with hearts as the pivot; if East has four clubs, I play a diamond-club squeeze, using the second heart as the squeeze card. Playing on clubs after only two rounds of trumps loses when RHO is 1255.

Edit: Corrected the typo, and please ignore the first two sentences, which I would remove if Frances hadn't already quoted one of them. When I read the problem, I thought trumps were 2-2.

This post has been edited by gnasher: 2009-March-24, 06:56

... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#3 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,483
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2009-March-24, 05:41

gnasher, on Mar 24 2009, 10:10 AM, said:

Don't I have six trumps, two hearts, two diamonds, a diamond ruff, and two clubs?

Only if you didn't listen to the auction.

But I agree with your revised line (after correcting typo) anyway.
Draw trumps in 3 rounds. Ruff a club in hand.
- If clubs are 3-3 claim
- If RHO has 4+ clubs run trumps and squeeze him in the minors
- If LHO has 4+ clubs run trumps for a double squeeze

The difference between the last two lines is your discard on the last trump in this position:

-
AK6
4
J


3
10
A7x
-

If RHO started with the clubs you discard a heart without thinking
If LHO started with the club you discard the club if it isn't good.

Quote

(BTW: I think this is easier than most problems appearing in this forum, but it seems on the tough side for a B/I problem).


It feels easy because it's a textbook hand. But if you haven't yet read the textbook, it's not.
0

#4 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2009-March-24, 06:53

FrancesHinden, on Mar 24 2009, 12:41 PM, said:

gnasher, on Mar 24 2009, 10:10 AM, said:

Don't I have six trumps, two hearts, two diamonds, a diamond ruff, and two clubs?

Only if you didn't listen to the auction.

I think you'll find that I didn't listen to the play.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#5 User is offline   Vilgan 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 359
  • Joined: 2005-December-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Seattle, WA
  • Interests:Hiking, MTG, Go, Pacific NW.

Posted 2009-March-24, 07:21

I only made 6 on this hand at the table :) No helpful diamond overcall though clarifying the risk of a diamond rough.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users