whereagles, on Mar 25 2009, 05:29 AM, said:
I know you keep telling moderators you don't like me breaking up your quotes, but I'm going to do it anyway because I think it's the easiest and cleanest way to reply. Sorry.
You shouldn't claim to know things you don't know. Then if or when you turn out to be wrong you end up looking foolish.
But if you want to know instead of guessing so that doesn't happen, I have one time before asked the moderators to ask you not to. Of course you are also aware I have about 50 times before asked you not to. What else can I do? You are apparently too dense to realize that aside from being less effective and more unwieldy than breaking into seperate quotes
me said:
that you can easily make seperate replies to
still me said:
it's a very very bad thing to do, and changes the meaning of what was said.
Quote
Issue 1: That is correct. However, I would bid 3NT because pard may pass if his major suit holdings aren't too extreme.
That's not a reason, he is more likely to pass 5
♣ than 3NT if he is all majors.
Quote
Agree this may confuse pard
Agree with who, I never said that.
Quote
Issue 2: If I'm sure 4NT is an invite to 6, I might try for 6!c now.
It is.
Quote
Masterminding? Probably. But with preempts you're always guessing anyway.
Guessing what to bid, sure, such as that 3NT could definitely turn out right. But not guessing what the bids mean.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.