Page 1 of 1
Another suit combination
#1
Posted 2009-March-05, 07:28
A topic in the B/I forum has started me thinking about another suit combination.
10xxx
AKx
A1087
Qx
KQxxx
xxx
Q642
A
You play in 4S. The defence leads a heart. You win and play a trump, then cash the ace of clubs and play another trump, LHO having singleton Jack. RHO wins and plays a heart. You draw the last trump and exit in hearts, RHO discarding a club. LHO concedes ruff-discard in clubs.
How do you play the diamonds?
What if you feel you can assume that LHO would have led a singleton diamond if he had one?
Does it make a difference if trumps were 2-2?
10xxx
AKx
A1087
Qx
KQxxx
xxx
Q642
A
You play in 4S. The defence leads a heart. You win and play a trump, then cash the ace of clubs and play another trump, LHO having singleton Jack. RHO wins and plays a heart. You draw the last trump and exit in hearts, RHO discarding a club. LHO concedes ruff-discard in clubs.
How do you play the diamonds?
What if you feel you can assume that LHO would have led a singleton diamond if he had one?
Does it make a difference if trumps were 2-2?
#2
Posted 2009-March-05, 10:58
This doesn't make sense. When did you ruff the ♣ in hand?
Can I assume:
1. ♥ won
2. ♠ to K
3. ♣ A
4. ♠ exited
5. ♥exited and won
6. ♣ruffed
7. last ♠ drawn
8. Exit a heart
9. ruff/sluff conceded
Can I assume:
1. ♥ won
2. ♠ to K
3. ♣ A
4. ♠ exited
5. ♥exited and won
6. ♣ruffed
7. last ♠ drawn
8. Exit a heart
9. ruff/sluff conceded
Hi y'all!
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#4
Posted 2009-March-05, 13:54
I would probably just play ♦A and ♦ to Q, even if trumps are 2-2.
Only difference would be that if trumps are 2-2, the chances of making increase.
Only difference would be that if trumps are 2-2, the chances of making increase.
#5
Posted 2009-March-05, 21:23
In a nutshell for reasons that I'm too lazy to retype, West appears to have at least three diamonds.
At T9, ruff the club in dummy and pitch the diamond. Diamond to Q and finesse the 10 later looks best.
Hi y'all!
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#6
Posted 2009-March-05, 22:24
So Phil loses when Rho has Jx (3 holdings) or LHO has the stiff king.
Trumpace loses when RHO has - (1 holding), x (3 holdings) or xx (3 holdings).
If spades did split 2-2 then ace and low to the queen would win if LHO had Kx (3 holdings) which would make trumpace the slight winner since the holdings for which he loses are slightly less likely. Unless we think it is reasonable for LHO to lead the stiff king, that would probably make Phil the winner again. Well, I would have to look up how likely the holdings are, and I might need to know what heart spots were played.
But they were 3-1, right?
Trumpace loses when RHO has - (1 holding), x (3 holdings) or xx (3 holdings).
If spades did split 2-2 then ace and low to the queen would win if LHO had Kx (3 holdings) which would make trumpace the slight winner since the holdings for which he loses are slightly less likely. Unless we think it is reasonable for LHO to lead the stiff king, that would probably make Phil the winner again. Well, I would have to look up how likely the holdings are, and I might need to know what heart spots were played.
But they were 3-1, right?
and the result can be plotted on a graph.
#7
Posted 2009-March-05, 23:51
LHO has a complete count of the hand so he can afford to give a sluff n ruff with no worry. So low the the Q is best. followed by low to T
LHO doesnt have a Stiff. So its will only fail
Kx+++Jxx
or
Kxx+++ Jx
West has 8 known card and east 7
will work about 77-78%
LHO doesnt have a Stiff. So its will only fail
Kx+++Jxx
or
Kxx+++ Jx
West has 8 known card and east 7
will work about 77-78%
From Psych "I mean, Gus and I never see eye-to-eye on work stuff.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#8
Posted 2009-March-06, 02:45
What was the early bidding, what was the vulnerability, and what honours were played in hearts and clubs?
Presumably I either opened 1♠ or responded 1♠ to 1♦, and West didn't bid over that. Suppose that I knew West had ♥QJ, and suspected that he had ♣K. With J QJxxx KJx Kxxx or J QJxxx Kx Kxxxx he might have bid over 1♠, so ace and another diamond would be best.
We might make similar inferences about some of the other layouts that have been mentioned:
- If West has a singleton diamond, that would give him 11 round-suit cards, on which he might have bid. A void would give him a 5-7 shape.
- If West has five diamonds, that gives East eight clubs. If that were the layout, I think we'd probably know.
Presumably I either opened 1♠ or responded 1♠ to 1♦, and West didn't bid over that. Suppose that I knew West had ♥QJ, and suspected that he had ♣K. With J QJxxx KJx Kxxx or J QJxxx Kx Kxxxx he might have bid over 1♠, so ace and another diamond would be best.
We might make similar inferences about some of the other layouts that have been mentioned:
- If West has a singleton diamond, that would give him 11 round-suit cards, on which he might have bid. A void would give him a 5-7 shape.
- If West has five diamonds, that gives East eight clubs. If that were the layout, I think we'd probably know.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
#9
Posted 2009-March-06, 03:29
It's here
If trumps were 2-2, this is the end position when they concede R&D
xx
-
A1087
-
xx
-
Q642
If trumps were 3-1, this is the end position
x
-
A1087
-
x
-
Q642
-
I believe the two positions are qualitatively different, but I haven't worked out what the right answer is yet...
If trumps were 2-2, this is the end position when they concede R&D
xx
-
A1087
-
xx
-
Q642
If trumps were 3-1, this is the end position
x
-
A1087
-
x
-
Q642
-
I believe the two positions are qualitatively different, but I haven't worked out what the right answer is yet...
#10
Posted 2009-March-06, 03:35
Hidden:
Spoiler
If you lose all hope, you can always find it again -- Richard Ford in The Sportswriter
#11
Posted 2009-March-06, 04:26
I'd be in dummy in this position:
♠---
♥---
♦AT87
♣---
♠x
♥---
♦Q64
♣
I'm gonna play a 'low' diamond from the table, and hopefully let it get to LHO, whom I deem as the holder of the ♦K. If RHO plays the ♦9 I'll have to play the ♦Q and then decide whether he had ♦J9 or ♦9x or ♦9.
♠---
♥---
♦AT87
♣---
♠x
♥---
♦Q64
♣
I'm gonna play a 'low' diamond from the table, and hopefully let it get to LHO, whom I deem as the holder of the ♦K. If RHO plays the ♦9 I'll have to play the ♦Q and then decide whether he had ♦J9 or ♦9x or ♦9.
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
Also, he rates to not have a heart void when he leads the ♥3.
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
Besides playing for fun, most people also like to play bridge to win
My YouTube Channel
Page 1 of 1

Help
