What additional convention would you add to this?
#21
Posted 2009-March-03, 13:25
I have heard many times from teachers that their students would bid better if their never learnt blackwood. However, its an easy convention to teach and best way to start learning the use if codified responses.
You can actually live without transfers, and without stayman as well. Without 4SF it is a bit harder.
#22
Posted 2009-March-03, 13:29
If you simply teach them: if I jump, it shows a good hand, you obviate the need for 4SF or NMF.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#23
Posted 2009-March-03, 13:33
Phil, on Mar 3 2009, 02:29 PM, said:
I agree. Hugely important on an advanced or better level. I don't see why you would teach it to beginners though.
#24
Posted 2009-March-03, 13:34
#25
Posted 2009-March-03, 13:49
#26
Posted 2009-March-03, 13:53
Echognome, on Mar 3 2009, 01:11 PM, said:
If there were a *Beginner Class Teachers* forum, it would be perfect for this one topic. Jus kidding!
#27
Posted 2009-March-03, 14:23
Add ones that match your perceived need when you are ready.
When approaching expert, now develop a partnership with agreed conventions.
#28
Posted 2009-March-03, 14:55
I don't think that I deviate significantly from what other folks have recommended, however, the heirarchy is probably a bit different
First and foremost, Blackwood is a crutch. Strike it from the list
Here are the three things that I think need to be introduced early
#1. Doubles are rarely for penalties
Takeout doubles
Negative doubles
Other doubles
#2. "Cheap" bids are often prepared, if not downright artificial
Stayman
2NT asking bid after a weak 2S opening
New Minor Forcing
#3. Transfers are very useful
#29
Posted 2009-March-03, 15:57
#30
Posted 2009-March-03, 16:18
hanp, on Mar 3 2009, 09:57 PM, said:
what can I say?, at least you didn't use the F* word
#31
Posted 2009-March-03, 16:47
I am surprised how come people only thinking attack but care less for defense side.

Help
