BBO Discussion Forums: 2, 3, 4 again - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2, 3, 4 again

Poll: what would you bid? (32 member(s) have cast votes)

what would you bid?

  1. 2 hearts (25 votes [78.12%])

    Percentage of vote: 78.12%

  2. 3 hearts (4 votes [12.50%])

    Percentage of vote: 12.50%

  3. 4 hearts (3 votes [9.38%])

    Percentage of vote: 9.38%

  4. somethign else (explain) (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2009-February-28, 07:25

♠4
♥K10987543
♦A9
♣AK


nobody vul
S - N
1♥-2♦ (GF)
??
BridgeGod: my personal website with interactive problems and articles
0

#2 User is offline   mtvesuvius 

  • Vesuvius the Violent Volcano
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,216
  • Joined: 2008-December-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tampa-Area, Florida
  • Interests:SLEEPING

Posted 2009-February-28, 07:28

I think I'll start with 2♥, then bid 4♥ over partner's 3♦ or 2NT.
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
0

#3 User is offline   skjaeran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,727
  • Joined: 2006-June-05
  • Location:Oslo, Norway
  • Interests:Bridge, sports, Sci-fi, fantasy

Posted 2009-February-28, 12:13

2♥ followed by 4♥.
I won't overstate my suit quality. Playing 6♥ vs a low singleton isn't a good idea IMO.
Kind regards,
Harald
0

#4 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,929
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2009-February-28, 12:44

Hi,

3H.

We play hearts, I will tell p this as fast as possible.

I have seen the suggested plan 2H - 4H, maybe
better.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#5 User is offline   mtvesuvius 

  • Vesuvius the Violent Volcano
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,216
  • Joined: 2008-December-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tampa-Area, Florida
  • Interests:SLEEPING

Posted 2009-February-28, 12:50

P_Marlowe, on Feb 28 2009, 01:44 PM, said:

Hi,

3H.

We play hearts, I will tell p this as fast as possible.

I have seen the suggested plan 2H - 4H, maybe
better.

With kind regards
Marlowe

I originally thought this was better also, however 3♥ shows a much better trump suit; true we have 8 of them, but 3♥ shows nearly a self sustaining trump suit IMO.
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
0

#6 User is offline   Hanoi5 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,083
  • Joined: 2006-August-31
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Santiago, Chile
  • Interests:Bridge, Video Games, Languages, Travelling.

Posted 2009-February-28, 13:27

We're in a forcing game situation, 2♥ should be enough.

 wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:

Also, he rates to not have a heart void when he leads the ♥3.


 rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:

Besides playing for fun, most people also like to play bridge to win


My YouTube Channel
0

#7 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2009-February-28, 13:28

The 1st difficulty is to decide whether we want to show our hand or to let pard describe his.

If we do the latter, 2♥ seems perfect. But, since I don't think the info pard can show will be very helpful, I'll just try and tell pard what I have.

So 3♥ seems just about par. Then we pull pard's next bid to 4♥ and hope he can make an educated guess afterwards.

And no, I don't agree that 3♥ should show a near-solid suit. That's, in my opinion, too restrictive.
0

#8 User is offline   RichMor 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 279
  • Joined: 2008-July-15
  • Location:North Central US

Posted 2009-March-01, 12:21

I bid 3♥. It may turn out badly but the alternative - 2♥ followed by 4♥ - seems like a substantial underbid.

It really depends on the luck of the dummy.
0

#9 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2009-March-01, 13:34

2♥ wtp. You may belong in ♦ and you have space to explore...
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
0

#10 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2009-March-02, 03:08

For me 3 ♥ would show good hearts and not this suit, so I am really surprised for the votes.
I can show this hand with 2 ♥ followed by 4 ♥.
Kind Regards

Roland

Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#11 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2009-March-02, 05:01

Codo, on Mar 2 2009, 09:08 AM, said:

I can show this hand with 2 ♥ followed by 4 ♥.

In my opninon, no, you can't. You have way too many controls to bid a mere 2♥. Your auction would be fine if you had an ace less, say

x
KT9xxxxx
Ax
Kx

or

x
KT9xxxxx
xx
AK

It is the wealth of top tricks that swings me into bidding 3♥. You lie about suit solidity (which might not even be a problem), but describe playing strength more accurately.
0

#12 User is offline   mtvesuvius 

  • Vesuvius the Violent Volcano
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,216
  • Joined: 2008-December-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tampa-Area, Florida
  • Interests:SLEEPING

Posted 2009-March-02, 08:31

whereagles, on Mar 2 2009, 06:01 AM, said:

It is the wealth of top tricks that swings me into bidding 3♥. You lie about suit solidity (which might not even be a problem), but describe playing strength more accurately.

Bidding 3♥ shows willingness to play slam opposite a small singleton

2♥ is still GF, and you will jump on your next turn.
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
0

#13 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2009-March-02, 10:07

mtvesuvius, on Mar 2 2009, 02:31 PM, said:

Bidding 3♥ shows willingness to play slam opposite a small singleton

That's your definition, not mine. Sorry :)
0

#14 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,093
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2009-March-02, 10:08

I don't like the 2/4 idea. 2 and then 4 for me shows something more like x, AQJxxxx, xx, Axx.

I will start with 2♥, bid 3♥ over whatever and then self-cue over 3N. If pard is holding a trump honor, he should cooperate.
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#15 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2009-March-02, 10:24

Phil, on Mar 2 2009, 11:08 AM, said:

I don't like the 2/4 idea. 2 and then 4 for me shows something more like x, AQJxxxx, xx, Axx.

I will start with 2♥, bid 3♥ over whatever and then self-cue over 3N. If pard is holding a trump honor, he should cooperate.

Pretty much I agree with this. I take 2 then 4 as a weaker hand with a stronger suit.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#16 User is offline   hanp 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,987
  • Joined: 2009-February-15

Posted 2009-March-02, 12:45

Agree with Phil's plan. 3H would show much better hearts. 4H would show these hearts but a much weaker hand.

Sorry guys, I keep running into threads where somebody else has already said it all
and the result can be plotted on a graph.
0

#17 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2009-March-02, 12:59

Btw, I remember Fred once posted his partnership agreements for the differences between (after a 2/1 response) 1 then 4, 1 then 3, 1 then 2 then 3, 1 then 2 then 4, etc. I remember thinking it was an extremely good summary and that I agreed with all his definitions almost to a tee. I don't suppose you are out there reading this and could maybe give your thoughts, fearless leader? Or maybe some amazing searcher could find his post, I think it was a year or two ago.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#18 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2009-March-02, 13:33

http://forums.bridge...showtopic=18989
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#19 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2009-March-03, 13:26

partner held something like KQxx-J-KJ10xx-Qxx you were gonna end up in 4♥ almost anyway.
BridgeGod: my personal website with interactive problems and articles
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users