BBO Discussion Forums: Re-classifying the Forums - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Re-classifying the Forums

Poll: My Views on Re-Classification Are: (20 member(s) have cast votes)

My Views on Re-Classification Are:

  1. I Like Your Proposed Re-Classification without Tags (4 votes [20.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 20.00%

  2. I Like Your Proposed Re-Classification with Tags (3 votes [15.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 15.00%

  3. I Like a Re-Classification, but Would Change the Categories and/or Tags (please explain below) (8 votes [40.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 40.00%

  4. I Like the BBF Classification as is. Please Do Not Change It. (5 votes [25.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 25.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#21 User is offline   david_c 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,178
  • Joined: 2004-November-14
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Mathematics;<br>20th century classical music;<br>Composing.

Posted 2009-February-27, 11:19

Stephen Tu, on Feb 27 2009, 05:38 PM, said:

Quote

I disagree with the "there should be fewer forums" crowd. I think it is very helpful to put things in different forums depending on what sort of replies you are looking for. So:


?? I don't think having tons of categories will achieve the effect you desire. It doesn't work now, does it?

Sure it does. Responses in the B/I forum are totally different to those elsewhere. (e.g. People are aware that they are supposed to explain more basic things, and that they're not being asked for their own pet esoteric conventions.) Anyway I'm not asking for "tons of categories", just an "ask the experts" forum.
0

#22 User is offline   barmar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 22,018
  • Joined: 2004-August-21
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2009-February-27, 11:20

hrothgar, on Feb 26 2009, 04:47 PM, said:

awm, on Feb 26 2009, 10:54 PM, said:

Perhaps a better solution is to compress the "systems/conventions" forums you suggested into just two ("standard" systems and common conventions... vs. "unusual" systems and conventions -- pretty much what we have now)

I suggest

"What we play" and "Weird *****"...

Aren't those the same thing for you?
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users