Hand 2: 02/22
#1
Posted 2009-February-22, 19:34
White versus Red
♠ KQTxx
♥ JT85
♦ Qxx
♣ x
Auction starts
1♦ - (2♣) - X - (3♣)
3♦ - (P) - ???
What's your call?
#2
Posted 2009-February-22, 19:57
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
#4
Posted 2009-February-22, 20:00
#5
Posted 2009-February-22, 22:06
mtvesuvius, on Feb 22 2009, 09:00 PM, said:
Partner has X available, but he is the one with length in clubs. If he doubled here, he risks his partner bidding 3M when he doesn't have Diamond tolerance. If responder had 5-5-2-1 he'd somewhat stuck, not anxious to defend 3♣, but not sure if bidding 3♦ on a worthless doubleton is better.
#6
Posted 2009-February-23, 00:25
Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.
Best Regards Ole Berg
_____________________________________
We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:
- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.
Gnasher
#7
Posted 2009-February-23, 01:04
Saying that partner can double here is not meaningful, double does not show a good hand with diamonds. You will usually just bid 3M over this, which bypasses 3♦. Consequently it is standard for 3♦ here to show a good hand, or at least good playing strength, for diamonds. You just have to pass with minimum hands with 6♦, but that is really not so bad anyway.
#8
Posted 2009-February-23, 01:19
You should be ok to get to 4D at least and this gives you a shot at the Major game without overstating your strength, and your hand has been steadily improved by the bidding (shortage in their suit, real D with playing strength opposite). I know we are not vul, but there is still a bonus for game bids!!
I hate people who bid this way with 5+5+Majors - but realise that that is a possible interpretation for some.
regards,
#9
Posted 2009-February-23, 02:15
Impact, on Feb 23 2009, 12:19 AM, said:
I think this should show 6 spades, and so partner is definitely going to raise us with 2 spades and will sometimes raise us with a singleton. I think 5♦ will usually be a better contract in the first scenario and will almost always be better in the second scenario.
If partner bids 4M after 4♦ it is a choice of games with 3 cards in the major, so we will still get to most of our 5-3 spade fits if we bid 4♦.
#10
Posted 2009-February-23, 03:58
We do not play NFBs (at least it was not posted), so I can bid 3 Spade now, showing 5 spades, hoping that this will lead to 3 NT 4 Spades or 5 Diamond.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#11
Posted 2009-February-23, 04:32
#12
Posted 2009-February-23, 05:10
The_Hog, on Feb 23 2009, 10:32 AM, said:
This depends on agreements Ron.
#13
Posted 2009-February-23, 05:20
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#14
Posted 2009-February-23, 06:08
I did throw a dice, it showed, we play game, so we
either play 4S or 5C.
I cant bid 4D because this would be a move toward
slam.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#15
Posted 2009-February-23, 11:12
P_Marlowe, on Feb 23 2009, 07:08 AM, said:
I did throw a dice, it showed, we play game, so we
either play 4S or 5C.
I cant bid 4D because this would be a move toward
slam.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Does this make any sense or it is just me?
I'm a 3♠ bidder; I already promised both majors, and now I'm sugesting a valid strain for game, which may well be the winner. I think ♦ tolerance is implied as I could easily pass 3♦
#16
Posted 2009-February-23, 11:24
fachiru, on Feb 23 2009, 12:12 PM, said:
P_Marlowe, on Feb 23 2009, 07:08 AM, said:
I did throw a dice, it showed, we play game, so we
either play 4S or 5C.
I cant bid 4D because this would be a move toward
slam.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Does this make any sense or it is just me?
I'm a 3♠ bidder; I already promised both majors, and now I'm sugesting a valid strain for game, which may well be the winner. I think ♦ tolerance is implied as I could easily pass 3♦
Not sure, in which direction the comment goes.
For me it is either pass, or driving towards game.
I think it is close, and depending on my mood, my
decision may be different, if you would ask me
tommorow.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#17
Posted 2009-February-23, 11:32
By doubling and then bidding 3 spades we are showing one of these 2:
-Weak hand with long spades, not strong enough to bid 2♠ before.
-Opening values with 5+ spades (Negative free bid).
None of these 2 types of hand is close to ours
#18
Posted 2009-February-23, 11:41
#19
Posted 2009-February-23, 13:16
#20
Posted 2009-February-23, 13:26
Most partners deserve a nice dummy once in a while, and partner may have already guessed our minor shape by looking at his own club length.

Help
