Standard meaning of 1S--4H ? didnt have time to talk about it.
#1
Posted 2009-February-18, 00:54
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#2
Posted 2009-February-18, 00:57
#3
Posted 2009-February-18, 01:06
#4
Posted 2009-February-18, 01:52
#5
Posted 2009-February-18, 01:58
Another little chestnut is 1N - 2♥ - 2♠ - 4♥.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#6
Posted 2009-February-18, 02:06
Still with a pickup I'd think "Splinter". With the natural hand he should bid 1NT followed by 4♥.
#7
Posted 2009-February-18, 02:31
Some more recent partnerships have it as splinter ... except in competition.
p
#8
Posted 2009-February-18, 03:22
#10
Posted 2009-February-18, 04:56
jdonn, on Feb 18 2009, 08:06 AM, said:
Hell yeah! Our teammates played in the 1-1 fit as opposed to a 5-4 in a recent national event on this auction and played like stars to only go down three. Luckily on our table they (over?)bid to a spade slam off two, so a lack of discussion only cost 2 IMPs.
#12
Posted 2009-February-18, 07:37
#13
Posted 2009-February-18, 08:39
No seriously, this is a splinter.
#14
Posted 2009-February-18, 08:52
Don't bid 4♥!... unless you want to test your 2-1 fit declaring skills...
#15
Posted 2009-February-18, 12:29
With any serious partner I make the agreement that 1S 3H is a splinter and 1S 4H is to play.
#16
Posted 2009-February-18, 13:01
That said, a funny story. When I taught my wife splinters, I forgot to be specific about 1♥-P-3♠. EVerything else at the 4-level was a splinter and everything at the 3-level weak (actually, intermediate, like a strong weak 2). This anomaly was not discussed.
So, 1♥-P-3♠ started a sequence where we ended up in 6♥. I had AKQxxx in hearts, opposite her stiff heart, but the suit split 3-3. I had spade support with her, and the spades split 2-2, missing the Ace. In one of the side suits, one opponent had a stiff. Thus, 6♥ made easily. However, against 6♠, the defense ended up scoring a ruff. Top board, well-bid.
-P.J. Painter.
#17
Posted 2009-February-18, 13:52
Actually, I've got a good story here. The swedish laws guru, Hallén once played a tournament with a new partner. And of course this auction came up. Without any agreement. This was a long time ago, so natural was pretty normal. Hallén looked at his own hand to find a clue to what partner held. Looking at a void, he thought it was odds on that his partner had hearts, and passed. Becoming dummy in the 0-0 fit!
Harald
#18
Posted 2009-February-18, 19:00
Ant590, on Feb 18 2009, 10:56 AM, said:
jdonn, on Feb 18 2009, 08:06 AM, said:
Hell yeah! Our teammates played in the 1-1 fit as opposed to a 5-4 in a recent national event on this auction and played like stars to only go down three. Luckily on our table they (over?)bid to a spade slam off two, so a lack of discussion only cost 2 IMPs.
Dude, I went 5 off if you are talking about National Swiss.
And yes, partner tried to deduce that it wasn't a splinter cos he had a singleton as well
Unless explicitly stated, none of my views here can be taken to represent SCBA or any other organizations.
#20
Posted 2009-February-18, 22:05
kenrexford, on Feb 18 2009, 12:01 PM, said:
That said, a funny story. When I taught my wife splinters, I forgot to be specific about 1♥-P-3♠. EVerything else at the 4-level was a splinter and everything at the 3-level weak (actually, intermediate, like a strong weak 2). This anomaly was not discussed.
Hi Ken,
I learned all splinters except 1♥:3♠ at the 4level, now Im learning how important it is to be specific.
How about 1♣:1♥ 3♦.
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred

Help
