BBO Discussion Forums: Defence against 5C - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Defence against 5C Not tough i guess.

#1 User is offline   benlessard 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,465
  • Joined: 2006-January-07
  • Location:Montreal Canada
  • Interests:All games. i really mean all of them.

Posted 2009-February-03, 22:58

Scoring: IMP


(P)------2D-------(2S)--------P
(3C)-----P--------(4C)-------P
(5C)

You lead The A of D (attitude) followed by the K. Partner played the 4 & the Q only the D J is missing.
From Psych "I mean, Gus and I never see eye-to-eye on work stuff.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
0

#2 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2009-February-04, 02:29

PD does not have the jack, else he had played the queen on the first trick.
So I try a Diamond now.
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#3 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2009-February-04, 06:24

A third diamond is necessary if declarer has both major-suit aces and ♣A10xxxx or worse. A heart is necessary if he has something like A xx Jxx AJ1098xx or Ax xx Jxx AQxxxx. It's hard to estimate the likelihood of these, because they depend on how good the opponents' bidding is. I think it's a guess, but I'd try to cash partner's ♥A.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#4 User is offline   MFA 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,625
  • Joined: 2006-October-04
  • Location:Denmark

Posted 2009-February-04, 06:47

I would very much doubt that declarer had all 3 aces on this bidding... :P
Michael Askgaard
0

#5 User is offline   Hanoi5 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,083
  • Joined: 2006-August-31
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Santiago, Chile
  • Interests:Bridge, Video Games, Languages, Travelling.

Posted 2009-February-04, 07:01

I'm leading a diamond. If partner had QJx he could have played x-J or J-Q, so I believe x-Q could only be from Qx. Besides, why would TC put the ♣7 on the table?

View Postwyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:

Also, he rates to not have a heart void when he leads the ♥3.


View Postrbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:

Besides playing for fun, most people also like to play bridge to win


My YouTube Channel
0

#6 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2009-February-04, 07:07

MFA, on Feb 4 2009, 01:47 PM, said:

I would very much doubt that declarer had all 3 aces on this bidding... :P

Yes, reading the entire auction does make it less of a guess.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#7 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2009-February-04, 08:16

blush...
He passed first hand, well that makes the defence with the 3 diamond tricks quite unlikely.

Needs something like Void, Axxx,Jxx,ATxxxx to work. Given the bidding, this is possible, but the odds of partner having an ace are higher.
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users