Be a genius?
#1
Posted 2009-February-03, 02:37
all red, imps, KT9xx J QJxx K8x.
1N (3C) ?
X would be takeout if it matters...
#2
Posted 2009-February-03, 02:43
Partner will know what to do now.
He doesn't have to be a genius for that.
Finding your own mistakes is more productive than looking for partner's. It improves your game and is good for your soul. (Nige1)
#3
Posted 2009-February-03, 02:49
#4
Posted 2009-February-03, 07:14
A genius call would be X and bid 3 Spade over 3 Heart showing a hand with spades and a club stopper, but with no heart fit.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#7
Posted 2009-February-03, 13:41
I'll pay off to clubs 6322 around, RHO with AQJ and an outside entry. On other hands I expect 3NT to make much more often than 4♠ even if partner has a fit.
#8
Posted 2009-February-03, 16:36
jdonn, on Feb 3 2009, 03:49 AM, said:
I agree. 4♠ could easily be off on a ruff or just plain off 4 tricks.
#9
Posted 2009-February-03, 20:35
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#10
Posted 2009-February-03, 20:43
Phil, on Feb 4 2009, 02:35 AM, said:
While I like the method, I'm not convinced this is an ad for it - does transferring then bidding 3NT promise a stop? If so, what does responder do without one?
#11
Posted 2009-February-03, 21:32
Phil, on Feb 3 2009, 09:35 PM, said:
Obviously partner can't bid 3♠ with a min since the transfer should be invitational+. So if he is max you will miss 3NT anyway in all likelihood. So I like the method but I don't think this hand is such a great ad for it.
#12
Posted 2009-February-04, 04:42
Codo, on Feb 3 2009, 02:14 PM, said:
I voted 3NT for the same reason.

Help
