BBO Discussion Forums: Hand Where I Had No Idea What to Do #1 - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Hand Where I Had No Idea What to Do #1 Partner keeps bidding my short suits

#1 User is offline   MarkDean 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 595
  • Joined: 2008-April-30
  • Location:Pleasanton, CA, US

Posted 2009-January-26, 00:30

Scoring: IMP


Our bidding, opponents silent

1NT 2H (1NT = 14-16)
2S 3C
3NT 4C

You do not think the opps will let you bid 3NT. What is your call?
0

#2 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2009-January-26, 00:47

Obviously we can't cuebid or raise since that would show a club fit, so it's between 4 and 4NT. Since I like my A and K in partner's suits for playing in one of them, and the hearts are (relatively speaking) a bit skimpy, I'll bid 4.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#3 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2009-January-26, 01:50

4S.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0

#4 User is offline   JLOL 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,033
  • Joined: 2008-December-05

Posted 2009-January-26, 02:38

4S, I've already denied 3 spades and have a very suit oriented hand (Ax Kx, DA...), this describes my hand well. 4N would be a terrible bid imo.
0

#5 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2009-January-26, 03:28

4 the contract we wanna play
0

#6 User is offline   mtvesuvius 

  • Vesuvius the Violent Volcano
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,216
  • Joined: 2008-December-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tampa-Area, Florida
  • Interests:SLEEPING

Posted 2009-January-26, 07:03

4, which will hopefully be our home.
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
0

#7 User is offline   skjaeran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,727
  • Joined: 2006-June-05
  • Location:Oslo, Norway
  • Interests:Bridge, sports, Sci-fi, fantasy

Posted 2009-January-26, 11:58

Easy 4, for reasons mentioned above.
Kind regards,
Harald
0

#8 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,094
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2009-January-26, 12:02

4. Pard wants to play in a suit. Let 'em.
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#9 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2009-January-26, 15:58

4NT, which pard should take as natural, misfit, under penalty of having a chair thrown at him :)
0

#10 User is offline   MarkDean 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 595
  • Joined: 2008-April-30
  • Location:Pleasanton, CA, US

Posted 2009-January-27, 14:35

Thanks all for your replies.

I bid 4NT, down 2. (although I had hopes on a transfer squeeze, still waiting for one to actually work). 4 makes.

Partner had
KT9874
void
Q6
AQ752

In retrospect, 4 would have been a better bid.
0

#11 User is offline   kfay 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,208
  • Joined: 2007-July-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Michigan
  • Interests:Science, Sports

Posted 2009-January-27, 17:31

Yes, by both.
Kevin Fay
0

#12 User is offline   rogerclee 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,214
  • Joined: 2007-December-16
  • Location:Pasadena, CA

Posted 2009-January-27, 18:34

Agree with Kevin, 4 was just a bad bid by your partner.
0

#13 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2009-January-28, 04:27

4 was a bad bid?

Okay, so you give up on slam opposite:

♠ A6
♥ QJ74
A87
KT4

No easy way to bid a slam, I agree. But when pd had the hand he normally has (no 2 doubeltons) a slam in a black suit is a good idea as long as partner has values there and not much wasted in the reds.
So, it was bad luck, that pd found you with a 2452 (and a honour location that makes the 1 NT opening obvious).

And 4 did not lead to the wrong contract. It was just the 4 NT bid which was wrong.
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users