BBO Discussion Forums: Forcing or not - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Forcing or not Bidding question

Poll: Is 3D 100% forcing or not? (21 member(s) have cast votes)

Is 3D 100% forcing or not?

  1. Forcing (8 votes [38.10%])

    Percentage of vote: 38.10%

  2. Not Forcing (13 votes [61.90%])

    Percentage of vote: 61.90%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   InTime 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 133
  • Joined: 2008-October-07

Posted 2009-January-20, 02:48

North.....East.....South......West
1C.........1S.......Pass........Pass
Dble.......Pass....Pass........2H
Pass.......Pass....3D?

The question is:- Is 3D 100% forcing?
0

#2 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2009-January-20, 02:51

what would you do with a good diamond-spade two suiter otherwise? 3♥? doesn't sound very good to me... F

later edit: everyone else is right, I could have bid 2♦ the round before, NF it is.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#3 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2009-January-20, 03:04

It's a very good point to discuss and I don't know that either answer is 'standard'. To me non-forcing makes more sense. One reason is a hand worth forcing and with the shape to be bidding at this point would have been likely to act over 1♠ rather than risk a pass out. My other main reason is that I don't think it's a very good idea to prevent yourself from being able to compete in this spot if you are some shape like 5152. Maybe 2NT would come in handy for such a purpose, but that's the type of thing I don't think I would want to involve myself in here.

I am interested to check back later for further discussion on the topic.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#4 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2009-January-20, 03:19

Non-forcing. With a strong 5-5 in spades and diamonds, I'd have responded 2♦ over 1♠, anticipating this problem.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#5 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,482
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2009-January-20, 04:08

Sounds non-forcing to me. If I wanted to force, I could always bid 3H, or have bid 2D over 1S.
0

#6 User is offline   Walddk 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,190
  • Joined: 2003-September-30
  • Location:London, England
  • Interests:Cricket

Posted 2009-January-20, 04:59

Non-forcing. I would have bid 2♦ over 1♠ with a D/S two-suiter and a good hand. The hand in question could be ....

♠ AQ974
♥ 82
♦ J8732
♣ 10

Roland
It's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice
0

#7 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,482
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2009-January-20, 05:08

jdonn, on Jan 20 2009, 09:04 AM, said:

Maybe 2NT would come in handy for such a purpose, but that's the type of thing I don't think I would want to involve myself in here.

2NT sounds natural to me.
0

#8 User is offline   Edmunte1 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 593
  • Joined: 2003-October-26
  • Location:Galati, Romania

Posted 2009-January-20, 05:12

Non forcing constructive, i would have bid 3♥ otherwise with a forcing hand. Something like QJ108x x AQJxx xx
0

#9 User is offline   rogerclee 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,214
  • Joined: 2007-December-16
  • Location:Pasadena, CA

Posted 2009-January-20, 05:14

I would think it is nonforcing and doesn't even necessarily promise invitational values.
0

#10 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2009-January-20, 05:35

NF. You can cue if you want to force.
0

#11 User is offline   Hanoi5 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,083
  • Joined: 2006-August-31
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Santiago, Chile
  • Interests:Bridge, Video Games, Languages, Travelling.

Posted 2009-January-20, 06:24

I voted forcing, but, why didn't I double 2♥? why would I pass 1♠ with less than FG values and a two-suited hand?

 wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:

Also, he rates to not have a heart void when he leads the ♥3.


 rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:

Besides playing for fun, most people also like to play bridge to win


My YouTube Channel
0

#12 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,397
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Odense, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2009-January-20, 07:16

Hanoi5, on Jan 20 2009, 01:24 PM, said:

I voted forcing, but, why didn't I double 2♥? why would I pass 1♠ with less than FG values and a two-suited hand?

Double would be somewhat penalty oriented. Not something you do with 5152.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#13 User is offline   mtvesuvius 

  • Vesuvius the Violent Volcano
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,216
  • Joined: 2008-December-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tampa-Area, Florida
  • Interests:SLEEPING

Posted 2009-January-20, 07:35

NF. Roland's example is very relevent here. 2NT also sounds Natural.
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
0

#14 User is offline   Gerben42 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,577
  • Joined: 2005-March-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Erlangen, Germany
  • Interests:Astronomy, Mathematics
    Nuclear power

Posted 2009-January-20, 07:42

NF, because playing this as forcing would make this game too complicated for me.
Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do!
My Bridge Systems Page

BC Kultcamp Rieneck
0

#15 User is offline   mcphee 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,514
  • Joined: 2003-February-16

Posted 2009-January-20, 07:45

After making a penalty pass of 1S when then next hand bids 2H partners pass of 2H should be F I think, dble penalty , so the hand in balancing postion needs to be able to compete without being punished for previous judgement about playing 1S. It seems more important to me that partnerships discuss how many H dble would show.
0

#16 User is offline   Hanoi5 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,083
  • Joined: 2006-August-31
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Santiago, Chile
  • Interests:Bridge, Video Games, Languages, Travelling.

Posted 2009-January-20, 08:32

Quote

Non-forcing. I would have bid 2♦ over 1♠ with a D/S two-suiter and a good hand. The hand in question could be ....

♠AQ974
♥82
♦J8732
♣10

Roland


Is this a penalty pass at the one level?

 wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:

Also, he rates to not have a heart void when he leads the ♥3.


 rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:

Besides playing for fun, most people also like to play bridge to win


My YouTube Channel
0

#17 User is offline   mtvesuvius 

  • Vesuvius the Violent Volcano
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,216
  • Joined: 2008-December-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tampa-Area, Florida
  • Interests:SLEEPING

Posted 2009-January-20, 08:34

Hanoi5, on Jan 20 2009, 09:32 AM, said:

Quote

Non-forcing. I would have bid 2♦ over 1♠ with a D/S two-suiter and a good hand. The hand in question could be ....

♠AQ974
♥82
♦J8732
♣10

Roland


Is this a penalty pass at the one level?

Depends on your defense :rolleyes:. Another possible hand is:

♠ AKT9x
♥ xx
♦ T98xx
♣ x
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
0

#18 User is online   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,935
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2009-January-20, 16:42

Forcing.

Ok, I though a lot about it, but after having realized,
that South converted the reopening double, ... it was
clear for me, I dont care about a nonforcing 3D.
If he wanted to introduce diamonds in a nonforcing way,
he could bid 2D instead passing the reopeing double.
Since he did not, ... he should shut up.

Of course the main issue maybe, that one player believed
the pass over 2H to be forcing, the other nonforcing.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users