What's your rebid? Let's see how you handle it...
#1
Posted 2008-December-16, 12:59
♠x
♥Qxxx
♦AKQxxxx
♣x
Bidding goes:
Pass 1♦ 2♣ 2♠
3♣ X Pass 3♥
Pass ???
Well, probably it's not a rebid, a re-rebid maybe?
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#2
Posted 2008-December-16, 13:26
- hrothgar
#5
Posted 2008-December-16, 15:30
#6
Posted 2008-December-16, 15:40
Wild ass guess works.
Nothing will tell partner that you have this hand. So, you either bid 4♥ or 6♥, IMO. Maybe even 7♥.
I'll guess 6♥.
-P.J. Painter.
#7
Posted 2008-December-16, 15:42
4H, but I would not be there, what speaks against rebidding my
solid 7 card suit?
4D the round before.
with kind regards
Marlowe
PS: I dont think 3D the round before is enough, since this can be
passed, if not, of course the bid is perfect.
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#8
Posted 2008-December-16, 16:02
--Always remember you're unique. Just like everyone else.
#9
Posted 2008-December-16, 16:31
#10
Posted 2008-December-16, 16:41
#11
Posted 2008-December-16, 16:41
I would definitely bid just 4h now and wish partner luck. Slam needs way too many cards in partner's hand.
#12
Posted 2008-December-16, 17:42
Or is it that this hand HAS to be played in diamonds? It is MP after all.
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#13
Posted 2008-December-16, 17:44
Hanoi5, on Dec 16 2008, 06:42 PM, said:
Or is it that this hand HAS to be played in diamonds? It is MP after all.
Would 3♥ be an insufficient bid over 3♦ or something?
-P.J. Painter.
#14
Posted 2008-December-16, 18:02
jdonn, on Dec 16 2008, 04:30 PM, said:
abstain, ditto josh
#15
Posted 2008-December-16, 19:49
Quote
It may sound amazing but I hadn't thought of this.
However, what if bidding 3♦ makes partner think I don't have 4 hearts? The 3♣ double is a negative double which 'tends' to show 4 hearts, while I thought 3♦ denied it. Of course this shouldn't be so unless you have specifically this agreement, so I guess I should have bid 3♦. Only 9 tricks were available though.
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#16
Posted 2008-December-17, 04:21
As I have gone out of my to locate the heart fit. I guess I should bid 4H now.
4D is an interesting bid...
ps I think 3D is a better description of the hand rather than the dble.
BR
Viren
#17
Posted 2008-December-17, 04:36
kenrexford, on Dec 17 2008, 12:44 AM, said:
Hanoi5, on Dec 16 2008, 06:42 PM, said:
Or is it that this hand HAS to be played in diamonds? It is MP after all.
Would 3♥ be an insufficient bid over 3♦ or something?
No but p would not introduce a 4-card hearts over 3♦. If you really want to locate a 4-4 heart fit (which wouldn't be my priority) you have to double I think.
Anyway, ditto Viren.
#18
Posted 2008-December-17, 15:15
karlson, on Dec 16 2008, 05:41 PM, said:
Double was not just weird, it was really bad imo. Pointing this out seems like the most useful feedback to give.
- hrothgar
#19
Posted 2008-December-17, 15:30
helene_t, on Dec 17 2008, 05:36 AM, said:
kenrexford, on Dec 17 2008, 12:44 AM, said:
Hanoi5, on Dec 16 2008, 06:42 PM, said:
Or is it that this hand HAS to be played in diamonds? It is MP after all.
Would 3♥ be an insufficient bid over 3♦ or something?
No but p would not introduce a 4-card hearts over 3♦. If you really want to locate a 4-4 heart fit (which wouldn't be my priority) you have to double I think.
Anyway, ditto Viren.
Why would partner not bid a four-card heart suit after 3♦? Is there some rule that says that a 3♦ bidder cannot have four hearts, that a 2♠ bidder cannot have four hearts, and that you cannot bid them even if you have them?
-P.J. Painter.
#20
Posted 2008-December-17, 16:03

Help
