BBO Discussion Forums: Slammish or not - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Slammish or not

#1 User is offline   dcvetkov 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 260
  • Joined: 2005-September-19
  • Location:Toronto, Canada
  • Interests:bridge, swimming, tennis

Posted 2008-December-02, 12:30



you have this hand and hear this bidding

LHO Pd RHO

3 4 Pass ?


Its not a great hand but you have 2 bullets and control in . Do you pass and take plus or you cue 4D in support of spades ( Assuming parther will decipher that meaning?)

- What kid of hand does jump to 4S show?
- What kid of hand would be double, and then 3 or 4 s? Which one is stronger?

Reasoning and examples, please;)
[COLOR=blue] aka Dimitar
0

#2 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2008-December-02, 12:33

I think slammish is right. I'd love to have Jx in trumps, or even 10x, but I don't have that. I think I'd bid 5 (if 5 would be the partnership bid to ask about a heart control).
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#3 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2008-December-02, 12:35

I like 5. It feels exactly in the invitational range, just worth one move then leaving it to partner.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#4 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2008-December-02, 12:51

You have to know your partner. The other night, playing with a relatively unknown partner in an ACBL Pairs game on BBO, this exact auction came up. I had Qxxx of spades, and an ace and king on the side. With some partners I would take a call, but I chose to pass. Partner had a balanced 17 count with AKJTx of spades. We barely made game.

Now, I am not saying that many players would make the bid my partner made on his cards (at least, I hope there are not), but there are quite a few players out there who are very aggressive in bidding games over preempts. So bidding to the 5 level on these cards may produce a minus score.
0

#5 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2008-December-02, 12:57

Good point. If partner doesn't know how to play bridge then the correct bid may do a lot worse.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#6 User is offline   dcvetkov 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 260
  • Joined: 2005-September-19
  • Location:Toronto, Canada
  • Interests:bridge, swimming, tennis

Posted 2008-December-02, 13:21

jdonn, on Dec 2 2008, 01:57 PM, said:

Good point. If partner doesn't know how to play bridge then the correct bid may do a lot worse.

LOL

Josh, I must say this was cute.:P

Oh, by the way, do you think 4, should be 6+spades, most of the time? Should it promise six 100% of the time?
[COLOR=blue] aka Dimitar
0

#7 User is offline   dcvetkov 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 260
  • Joined: 2005-September-19
  • Location:Toronto, Canada
  • Interests:bridge, swimming, tennis

Posted 2008-December-03, 06:32



This was partner's hand. Draw your own conclusions if 4S was right
[COLOR=blue] aka Dimitar
0

#8 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2008-December-03, 07:24

LOL
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#9 User is offline   rogerclee 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,214
  • Joined: 2007-December-16
  • Location:Pasadena, CA

Posted 2008-December-03, 09:20

dcvetkov, on Dec 3 2008, 05:32 AM, said:



This was partner's hand. Draw your own conclusions if 4S was right

I was afraid partner would have something like this!
0

#10 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2008-December-03, 09:53

4S shows 6+ spades and a hand too good for 3S. A good example would be AKJ10xxx x KQx Ax but partner can be slightly worse.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#11 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2008-December-03, 10:46

contrary to popular belief, fast arrival does not apply when you make your first bid over a preempt.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#12 User is offline   mikeh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,652
  • Joined: 2005-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.

Posted 2008-December-03, 12:46

han, on Dec 3 2008, 10:53 AM, said:

4S shows 6+ spades and a hand too good for 3S. A good example would be AKJ10xxx x KQx Ax but partner can be slightly worse.

And so could his hand
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
0

#13 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2008-December-03, 17:56

I would't bid over 4 because pard is bound to have short hearts, in which case he might have streched to bid 4 (which he did!)
0

#14 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2008-December-03, 17:58

Why would partner stretch to jump to 4S with short hearts?
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#15 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2008-December-03, 18:02

whereagles, on Dec 3 2008, 06:56 PM, said:

I would't bid over 4 because pard is bound to have short hearts, in which case he might have streched to bid 4 (which he did!)

I hope you aren't basing your answer on the hand he actually held.

Also I have no idea why he would stretch to bid 4 with short hearts. He would stretch to bid SOMETHING, but given that he is already bidding something there is no reason to either overbid or misbid like he did.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#16 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2008-December-03, 18:25

jdonn, on Dec 4 2008, 12:02 AM, said:

Also I have no idea why he would stretch to bid 4 with short hearts.

With short hearts the pressure to bid is greater because it's unlikely pard, who's long in hearts and short in spades, will balance.

For instance:

AKQxxxx
x
Ax
xxx

is quite enough to a 4 bid over 3. At least I think so. Note that long spades mean pard isn't likely to raise a 3 bid because he'll have x/xx only. This makes a direct game bid more attractive.
0

#17 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2008-December-03, 18:38

whereagles, on Dec 3 2008, 07:25 PM, said:

jdonn, on Dec 4 2008, 12:02 AM, said:

Also I have no idea why he would stretch to bid 4 with short hearts.

With short hearts the pressure to bid is greater because it's unlikely pard, who's long in hearts and short in spades, will balance.

I agree, which you would notice if you had quoted my entire post and responded to the point I actually made.

jdonn, on Dec 3 2008, 07:02 PM, said:

He would stretch to bid SOMETHING, but given that he is already bidding something there is no reason to either overbid or misbid like he did.

Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#18 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2008-December-04, 13:10

my head hurts...
0

#19 User is offline   poohbear 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 14
  • Joined: 2005-September-12

Posted 2008-December-05, 01:25

I think pass is 100% clear . lets take the given hand. AKQJxx x KQ10x Kx and everybody bids 4S. Do you really want to be in slam opposite this? It's not like it went 2H 4S. Partner only has 2 levels of spade bids available. Dont hang them
0

#20 User is offline   dcvetkov 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 260
  • Joined: 2005-September-19
  • Location:Toronto, Canada
  • Interests:bridge, swimming, tennis

Posted 2008-December-05, 08:55

poohbear, on Dec 5 2008, 02:25 AM, said:

I think pass is 100% clear . lets take the given hand. AKQJxx x KQ10x Kx and everybody bids 4S. Do you really want to be in slam opposite this? It's not like it went 2H 4S. Partner only has 2 levels of spade bids available. Dont hang them

I agree. It should show 6 spades and offensive hand, but not powerhouse.
But what kind of hand is then double first, and then bid 4S?

Nobody gave an example

Is this one close?

AKQJx x KQ10 AKxx
[COLOR=blue] aka Dimitar
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users