Help
Page 1 of 1
pre-emptive pass-out man, mouse or rat?
#1
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 707
- Joined: 2006-September-29
- Location:Australia
- Interests:whippets<br>anarchy<br>relay
Posted 2008-November-11, 18:22
#2
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 707
- Joined: 2006-September-29
- Location:Australia
- Interests:whippets<br>anarchy<br>relay
Posted 2008-November-23, 19:04
Apologies re delay. It seems not much interest anyway.
4♥ by North is the limit. 4♦ might have achieved this, though North has a likely slam try. I doubled but North bid 4♦ then continued with 4NT over my 4♥ for -300.
At the other table, North doubled 3♦, which worked well - 4♦ by South, 4♥ by North. How do you like double?
Scoring: IMP
3♦ - no - no - ?
3♦ - no - no - ?
4♥ by North is the limit. 4♦ might have achieved this, though North has a likely slam try. I doubled but North bid 4♦ then continued with 4NT over my 4♥ for -300.
At the other table, North doubled 3♦, which worked well - 4♦ by South, 4♥ by North. How do you like double?
#3
- Csaba the Hutt
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 13,027
- Joined: 2006-June-16
- Gender:Male
- Interests:bye
Posted 2008-November-24, 04:40
I don't like the following bids:
double at the other table;
double and 4NT at your table.
If preempts didn't work, people would stop playing them!
double at the other table;
double and 4NT at your table.
If preempts didn't work, people would stop playing them!
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
#4
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 14,900
- Joined: 2004-May-11
- Gender:Male
- Location:Portugal
- Interests:Everything!
Posted 2008-November-24, 16:49
I would bid 3♠ on the pass-out seat.
Page 1 of 1
3♦ - no - no ?
Layout in a few days ...