BBO Discussion Forums: Bidding Up the Ladder - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Bidding Up the Ladder Skip over Diamonds?

#1 User is offline   Califdude 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 62
  • Joined: 2008-August-29

Posted 2008-November-06, 15:20

You hold these hands:

a. Kxxx-xx-KJxx-xxx
b. AKxx-xx-KJxx-xxx
c. Jxxx-xx-AKJx-xxx
d. Kxxx-x-AKJxx-xxx
e. AKxx-x-AJxxxx-xx
f. AJxx-xx-Jxxxx-xx
g. Axxxx-xx-Axxxx-x
h. AKQJ-xx-AKQJ-xxx

Partner opens 1C. What do you bid? Do you bid up the ladder, or do you skip over the diamonds and bid 1S?

Thank you for your replies. :D
0

#2 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2008-November-06, 15:25

Mostly depends on who I play with, though you must be pretty sick to respond 1S on e. I also think 1S on g is clearly right.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#3 User is offline   Echognome 

  • Deipnosophist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,386
  • Joined: 2005-March-22

Posted 2008-November-06, 15:29

I normally play a Walsh style, so my answers are framed around that.

a. 1♠
b. 1♠
c. 1♠
d. 1♦ (would invite showing spades over 1N and over 2♣ I would GF. 4=3=5=1 would have been tougher)
e. 1♦ (clear GF)
f. 1♠
g. 1♠
h. 1♠
"Half the people you know are below average." - Steven Wright
0

#4 User is offline   vuroth 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,459
  • Joined: 2007-June-03
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-November-06, 16:00

Califdude, on Nov 6 2008, 04:20 PM, said:

You hold these hands:

a. Kxxx-xx-KJxx-xxx
b. AKxx-xx-KJxx-xxx
c. Jxxx-xx-AKJx-xxx
d. Kxxx-x-AKJxx-xxx
e. AKxx-x-AJxxxx-xx
f. AJxx-xx-Jxxxx-xx
g. Axxxx-xx-Axxxx-x
h. AKQJ-xx-AKQJ-xxx

Partner opens 1C. What do you bid? Do you bid up the ladder, or do you skip over the diamonds and bid 1S?

Thank you for your replies. :D

I don't play Walsh. I'd prefer to have a much stronger understanding of SAYC, and its weaknesses, before I go plugging holes.

Other than g, they're all 1♦. On g, 1♣ 1♦ 2♣ leaves you horribly endplayed.
Still decidedly intermediate - don't take my guesses as authoritative.

"gwnn" said:

rule number 1 in efficient forum reading:
hanp does not always mean literally what he writes.
0

#5 User is offline   awm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,715
  • Joined: 2005-February-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Zurich, Switzerland

Posted 2008-November-06, 17:34

Hand g is a clear 1♠ response. When holding two five card suits you bid the higher one first.

The rest of them, you could definitely respond 1♦ but it depends on style. Playing SAYC where it is normal to bid up-the-line, I would bid 1♦ on all but b (and the previously mentioned g).

Why? If I have longer diamonds than spades I always bid 1♦ in order to find the best fit (we could easily have a 5-3 diamond fit slam if partner has a big hand and we will never find it if I start 1♠). With 4-4 in the suits, it is "normal" to bid up the line but I think it is worth making some exceptions. I'd rate these exceptions as:

(1) If your diamonds are quite poor and spades are good, bidding the spades will help partner evaluate (in case he has a singleton in one of your suits). This would apply to example c if you reverse the suits.

(2) If your hand is good enough that you'd like to play 1NT or more opposite 12-14 balanced, but not so good that you have any real shot at a slam if partner is too weak to reverse, then it sometimes pays to bid the spades. If you have 6♦ you will find it when partner reverses into diamonds; if not you conceal the diamonds from the opposition and improve the odds that you right-side notrump in partner's hand. You might miss a good 5♦ game occasionally, but the vast majority of the time 3NT is a better game in any case. This applies only to hand b (hand a is too weak, hand c the spades are too lousy, hand h is too strong, the other hands have 5+♦).
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
0

#6 User is offline   Gerben42 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,577
  • Joined: 2005-March-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Erlangen, Germany
  • Interests:Astronomy, Mathematics
    Nuclear power

Posted 2008-November-07, 02:34

a. 1♠
b. 1♠
c. 1♦
d. 1♦
e. 1♦
f. 1♦
g. 1♠
h. 1♦

Some comments: I think in a) there is no point bidding 1♦. If you play this style, partner should assume that 1♦ is either strong or shows 5 cards. With 1♠ it's close, but would still bid 1♠.

With c, the ♦ are too nice to not bid them.
Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do!
My Bridge Systems Page

BC Kultcamp Rieneck
0

#7 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,135
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-November-07, 03:44

Hi,

assuming you dont play Walsh, and my advice
for B/I players would be, not to play it, than the
question is only, do you skip diamonds or not,
if you are 4-4.

Hence d,e,f, and g are not relevant.

I would usally bid diamonds, but I am starting
to begin to take the suit quality into the
consideration, but all the examples, which are
left, have a diamond suit with reasonable quality.

The point to understand is, why one would skip
the diamond suit, what is the gain / the loss.

The gain: you are better positioned, if they
overcall, the loss, the shape description by
responder looses a little bit accurracy.
Since people like to intervene a lot these days,
the gain is considered to have a bigger impact
than the loss. But there is a loss.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#8 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2008-November-07, 06:57

Lol I would bid 1S on them all, but then I play Mafia with regular pd.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0

#9 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,483
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2008-November-07, 07:34

Welcome to the pleasure of playing in an international environment!
The problem with something even as simple as this question, is that various bridge playing communities have different standards.

There are a few things that everyone playing a natural-based system (SA, 2/1, SEF, Acol etc) will agree on:

your hand g) With 5-5 in two suits, always respond in the higher suit (what you do on the next round depends on your strength and partner's rebid)
your hand e) With game forcing values, respond in your longer suit (so if you think this is a game force, respond 1D)
and (not shown)
With 5-spades and a 4-card minor, respond 1S

Once you get beyond these two points, it becomes a matter of style. Any beginner's bridge book you buy will tell you how to bid these hands, it's just they won't all say the same thing. If you all wanted to do was (e.g.) play standard French, we could give you a nice easy answer.
Like everyone else, I could just give you some rules, but I prefer to explain the logic behind it. The way to work out the right answer, is to think about opener's choice of opening bid, and opener's choice of rebid, bearing in mind that i) you would like to find any fit if you have one, but more importantly (ii) you would prefer not to miss a 4-4 major suit fit.

There are three styles of response:
1. "Up-the-line": with 4-4 or 4-5 in spades and diamonds, respond 1D
2. "Longest suit first": with 4-4 respond 1S, with 4-5 respond 1D
3. "Major first": respond 1S unless you have game forcing values

i) If you are playing a real 4-card major system, so a 1-minor opening is either an unbalanced hand or does not have a 4-card major, respond 1D. If partner does have a 4-card major he will bid it now, and you will not miss a fit.
ii) If you are playing a style where opener will always rebid a 4-card major if he has one, you can respond 1D. This (I believe) is the original standard american approach. Some SA texts say you should go for 'longest suit first'
iii) If you are playing a style where opener will always either open or rebid in NT with a balanced hand, you have to respond 1S, even with longer diamonds, unless you have a good hand, otherwise you might play in 1NT when you have a 4-4 spade fit available. This is the style called 'Walsh'.

You might point out a logical fallacy with option (3): if you have a strong enough hand to bid again over a 1NT rebid by opener, why not respond 1D and then look for a major suit fit over a 1NT rebid? This is a very good point, and so some people (including me) play that you respond 1S unless you have at least game-invitational values. However, that does seem to be a minority approach to life.
0

#10 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2008-November-07, 10:22

Great job everyone. You are throwing around terms like Mafia and Walsh like you would Toyota or Big Mac. Please remember your audience.

Read Frances' post. She actually EXPLAINS the different styles and the benefits of playing the different approaches.

I particularly liked this from her:

Quote

Like everyone else, I could just give you some rules, but I prefer to explain the logic behind it.

"Phil" on BBO
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users