Your visualisation required Bidding
#1
Posted 2008-November-06, 09:26
#2
Posted 2008-November-06, 09:28
#3
Posted 2008-November-06, 11:09
I'm never sure what to bid in these situations, though. Maybe 2NT, showing my balanced hand?
"gwnn" said:
hanp does not always mean literally what he writes.
#4
Posted 2008-November-06, 11:15
vuroth, on Nov 6 2008, 09:09 AM, said:
I'm never sure what to bid in these situations, though. Maybe 2NT, showing my balanced hand?
I think on balance the NT will play better from pard's side. I'd rather the lead go into the A-T, or A-9's.
3♦ for me.
#5
Posted 2008-November-06, 11:24
so if pard is min min he will pass with say1/2 hts if he did not rebid n/t over 1 ht
he may now bid 3n/t,and scrable 9 tricks
#6
Posted 2008-November-06, 11:35
-P.J. Painter.
#7
Posted 2008-November-06, 11:40
kenrexford, on Nov 6 2008, 09:35 AM, said:
I'd hide those thoughts too. And not because they aren't suitable for the BI's either
JK
#8
Posted 2008-November-06, 11:43
#9
Posted 2008-November-06, 11:47
-P.J. Painter.
#10
Posted 2008-November-06, 11:47
Is there any chance that partner would rebid 2♦ on a 5 card suit?
How often would partner raise hearts with 3 card support?
In most of my partnerships, North's 2♦ rebid would (essentially) promise 6 diamonds and would tend to deny three hearts.
Opposite said partner, I will happily bid 3♦, hoping to hear either 3N or 3♥

Help

North started with 1♦,2♦followed over your 1♥.
Do you think prospects are bright ?