BBO Discussion Forums: double? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

double?

Poll: double for takeout? (48 member(s) have cast votes)

double for takeout?

  1. Yes (8 votes [16.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 16.67%

  2. No (40 votes [83.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 83.33%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2008-October-18, 05:17

AQx
xxx
ATxx
Axx

1♦-?

unfavorable imps
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#2 User is offline   rogerclee 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,214
  • Joined: 2007-December-16
  • Location:Pasadena, CA

Posted 2008-October-18, 05:34

lol no
0

#3 User is offline   OleBerg 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,950
  • Joined: 2008-April-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Copenhagen
  • Interests:Model-Railways.

Posted 2008-October-18, 06:07

Depend on style and method.

If partner rigourushly bids his 4-card majors, I wouldn't. If I have a more flexible reply-scheme, I would.
_____________________________________

Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.

Best Regards Ole Berg

_____________________________________

We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:

- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.

Gnasher
0

#4 User is offline   dake50 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,211
  • Joined: 2006-April-22

Posted 2008-October-18, 07:54

Leave this hand for our reopening scheme. IF partner reopens.
0

#5 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2008-October-18, 10:00

No.
0

#6 User is offline   Ant590 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 749
  • Joined: 2005-July-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Melbourne, Australia

Posted 2008-October-18, 10:06

I was taught that this kind of hand is the reason why one should reopen when at all possible... so pass in comfort that partner will only pass 'when it's right' :)
0

#7 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,520
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-October-18, 14:52

I find 1N a lot more appealing than double.
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#8 User is offline   peachy 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,056
  • Joined: 2007-November-19
  • Location:Pacific Time

Posted 2008-October-19, 01:48

If you are determined not to Pass (the "right call" with this IMO) then bid 1NT. Why tell partner that you have short diamonds and opening hand when you don't have that.
0

#9 User is offline   effervesce 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 885
  • Joined: 2007-March-28

Posted 2008-October-19, 03:36

Pass. I prefer classic takeout shape for my doubles.
Ming

--Always remember you're unique. Just like everyone else.
0

#10 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,908
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-October-20, 01:28

Hi,

Pass.

If you want to bid, bid 1NT.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#11 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2008-October-20, 04:37

I was listening to the experts and a certain gold star for whom I have great respect said that the modern view is to double even with this hand. This time double didn't have any good or bad influences. Declarer played him for short diamonds but it didn't matter anyway.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#12 User is offline   Gerben42 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,577
  • Joined: 2005-March-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Erlangen, Germany
  • Interests:Astronomy, Mathematics
    Nuclear power

Posted 2008-October-20, 04:49

Quote


If you want to bid, bid 1NT.


No. Don't bid 1NT unless you have a decent 15-count... I don't think Dbl is that crazy, many good things can happen. Still, pass wouldn't be crazy either and would be my choice.
Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do!
My Bridge Systems Page

BC Kultcamp Rieneck
0

#13 User is offline   MFA 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,625
  • Joined: 2006-October-04
  • Location:Denmark

Posted 2008-October-20, 06:22

Pass, but I hate it, double is not crazy. 1NT I don't understand at all, it's just a silly overbid. Silly because nothing prevents us from agreeing 14-17NTs, if we want to overcall 1NT on bad 14's.
Michael Askgaard
0

#14 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2008-October-20, 06:59

I agree that 1NT is just silly. Some strong players would double but it is not my cup of tea, I would pass and not lose any sleep over it.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#15 User is offline   655321 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,502
  • Joined: 2007-December-22

Posted 2008-October-20, 07:24

Pass for me, but I don't mind double either.

I would not overcall 1NT because I don't think the hand is quite worth it. But I would not be as unkind as MFA and Han when describing the bid. i.e. I think it is a slight stretch, an overbid, rather than 'just silly'.

Anyway, even though I like 1NT a lot more than MFA and Han do, I still don't like it enough to bid it myself.
That's impossible. No one can give more than one hundred percent. By definition that is the most anyone can give.
0

#16 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2008-October-20, 07:39

I think it is a big overbid, and I really don't see any reason to do it. I just don't understand why anybody would choose such a bid so I think it is silly in that sense. If you want to overcall 1NT this light then you should just agree to do so. If you agree not to do so then you shouldn't. I think.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#17 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2008-October-20, 09:13

I kind of like double, since this is a pretty good 14. If you are getting in with a 4333, there isn't much difference between this and if the hand had ♦xxx/♣ATxx, which I'll bet everyone is doubling on. Its the 4333 12 counts that turn my stomach.

1N is silly. The hand is a lightweight. You can't really shade a 1N overcall unless the hand has some serious playing strength.
"Phil" on BBO
0

#18 User is offline   mikeh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,657
  • Joined: 2005-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.

Posted 2008-October-20, 09:26

I would double (and I suspect many other passers would as well) if my shape were 4333 or 3433, and maybe 3334, but this shape is just too wrong... it is not so much that it lacks the offensive strength if partner has a 5 card suit, or even some moysians, as it is that this is too defensive and too notrump oriented for a double, and lacks the strength to bid 1N. Pass is what it left, and it is not a crime to pass holding an opening hand.
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
0

#19 User is offline   Apollo81 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,162
  • Joined: 2006-July-10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 2008-October-20, 09:31

rogerclee, on Oct 18 2008, 07:34 AM, said:

lol no

agree, no matter what happens, partner won't be picking our best suit.
0

#20 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2008-October-20, 09:38

pclayton, on Oct 20 2008, 04:13 PM, said:

If you are getting in with a 4333, there isn't much difference between this and if the hand had ♦xxx/♣ATxx, which I'll bet everyone is doubling on.

I wouldn't double with that either.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users