downgrade 1nt?
#1
Posted 2008-September-13, 18:15
#2
Posted 2008-September-13, 18:42
- hrothgar
#3 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2008-September-13, 20:43
#5
Posted 2008-September-13, 22:45
#7
Posted 2008-September-14, 04:17
George Carlin
#8
Posted 2008-September-14, 10:00
Yes Han does it. He is a small minority, and we deservedly mock him
#9
Posted 2008-September-14, 10:42
jdonn, on Sep 14 2008, 08:00 AM, said:
Yes Han does it. He is a small minority, and we deservedly mock him
I know I'll get flamed for this, but if your judgment tells you not to open 1N at MPs, then don't do it. I've never bought into the whole "field" philosophy on hands like this.
If opening 1N rates to get you to a crappy 3N, then don't do it. I'm perfectly happy to play a superior contract than the rest of the field.
Using the 'field' logic, you should also open 1N with Ax Kxx AKxxx QJx. After all its a balanced 17, and we expect the sheep to open this 1N.
#10
Posted 2008-September-14, 10:51
I can understand that literal MW points may be significant if playing a weak 1NT, since failure to open with a bad 12-point is more likely to cause a passout than is failure to open a good 10-count. For strong NT, I don't see the relevance of the literal MW count. If I evaluate a particular 14-count as equally good as a particular 15-count then I should be equally likely to open 1NT on both of them.
#11
Posted 2008-September-14, 10:58
pclayton, on Sep 14 2008, 11:42 AM, said:
Who says it does?
#12
Posted 2008-September-14, 11:44
On the other hand, some really bad 15-counts are much worse than some really nice 14-counts. Only beginners would disagree with that. It doesn't make sense to me to open the former with 1NT and the latter with 1m. So I'll upgrade a 14-count if it seems to me that it will play like a reasonable 15-count, and I'll downgrade a 15-count if it seems to me that it will play worse than most 14-counts. Notice I much prefer upgrading to downgrading, mostly because I think it is generally and advantage to open 1NT.
It is true that in the past I've gone a bit far with upgrading and downgrading. The mocking was not only entertaining, it has also made me more conservative with this but I will still adjust HCP more often than Justin or Josh.
- hrothgar
#13
Posted 2008-September-14, 11:46
pclayton, on Sep 14 2008, 11:42 AM, said:
Yes, I would open 1NT with this hand, you don't have enough respect for spotcards Phil.
To upgrade out of a 1NT opening you will need to give me a better hand.
- hrothgar
#14
Posted 2008-September-14, 12:54
han, on Sep 14 2008, 12:44 PM, said:
The system works! It really works!!
#15
Posted 2008-September-14, 15:15
helene_t, on Sep 14 2008, 04:51 PM, said:
I think you should probably write something on your CC, but whether it should say 14-17 is, to me, an open question. Some people, probably the majority by a long way I guess open a fixed hcp range - normally 15-17 or 12-14. But, to use the weak range just for exmple, some of their 12s are no better than 11 and some of their 14s are worth a 15. If that is the really the case, is someone who upgrades good 11s to 12, downgrades bad 12s to 11, good 14s to 15 and bad 15s to 14 really being less accurate with their NT range if they call it 12-14? Should they really say 11-15, when, allowing for good/bad features, their range is arguably/actually more narrowly defined than someone who religiously plays 12-14hcp only?
Nick
#16
Posted 2008-September-15, 04:09
NickRW, on Sep 14 2008, 10:15 PM, said:
That is not what I am saying. Consider
KQJ
KQJ
xxxx
xxx
vs
Axx
KJTx
J9xx
Qx
T9
T9x
T9x
AKQJT
If you treat all of them as 12 points then IMHO you are misinforming. Your real lower range for a 1NT opening is closer to 11 in the sense that your minimum is a hand with a playing strength like an average balanced 11-count.
OTOH if you treat them as 12/11/10, or 11/11/11, or 10/11/12 then you are not biased relative to literal MW counts, you just have a judgment with which some would disagree. I think it would be overkill to make statements on the CC about method of hand evaluation but maybe it depends on the setting.
It's not clear to me what the purpose of the OP is. Is it about whether we use adjustments to MW counts when deciding whether or not to open 1NT? To this I suppose all of us would say yes.
Or is it about whether we are uncomfortable with the NT range stated on our CC and therefore look for opportunities to 1NT on more/fewer/weaker/stronger hands? Suppose 15-17 would spell 14.500-17.499 if one uses 3-digit accuracy, but have the partnership understanding to play 14.300-17.299 but write 15-17 on the CC for simplicity, then I would say I upgrade more often than I downgrade.
#17
Posted 2008-September-15, 04:59
Axxx
xxx
Axx
Axx
and especially so vulnerable in 3rd.
I will also downgrade a bad 15 eg with QJ stiff in a suit.
I still say 12-14 as any such up/downgrades occur infrequently. Stating 11+ to 15- is inaccurate as people might expect more 11 & 15 counts than actually occur, although I do say "may not open a poor 12" on my CC.
I consider this all fairly standard although am happy to be educated otherwise.
#18
Posted 2008-September-15, 08:19
Here are examples of then they hold 15 hcp and 4333 and what they open, draw your own conclusions.
IMP-223 miamiwiz Dlr: West
Board 28 S AK5 Vul: N-S
H AJ7
fanny4 D J95 stewball
S J97 C 8742 S Q642
H T54 H K983
D 76432 jec D A8
C T9 S T83 C Q63
H Q62
D KQT
C AKJ5
09-Dec-05 3:04:06 AM
First 2:27:53 AM, Last 3:04:06 AM
East South West North
fanny4 miamiwiz stewball jec
Pass 1C
Pass 2NT* Pass 3NT
Pass Pass Pass
1. forcing
------------------------------------------
IMP-1616 jec Dlr: East
Board 26 S J96 Vul: Both
H AT985
ybob D A43 supermax
S KT8 C J6 S Q754
H 6 H J32
D K752 miamiwiz D JT9
C 98732 S A32 C KQ5
H KQ74
D Q86
C AT4
East South West North
ybob jec supermax miamiwiz
Pass Pass Pass 1C
Pass 1H Pass 2H
Pass Pass Pass
------------------------------------------
IMP-387 ollina Dlr: East
Board 26 S QT642 Vul: Both
H KT2
baylind D T4 coach1
S J7 C Q96 S K5
H A6543 H 87
D KQ982 jec D J73
C K S A983 C JT7532
H QJ9
D A65
C A84
West North East South
baylind ollina coach1 jec
47.24 65.87 52.22 60.41
Pass 1C
1H 1S Pass 2S
3D 3S Pass Pass
Pass
------------------------------------------
IMP-1840 miamiwiz Dlr: West
Board 8 S AQT9 Vul: None
H Q83
helstokk D Q98 ghelgemo
S J743 C T98 S K5
H AKT62 H 94
D JT6 jec D K752
C 3 S 862 C 76542
H J75
D A43
C AKQJ
West North East South
helstokk miamiwiz ghelgemo jec
45.94 56.44 48.36 60.41
Pass Pass Pass 1C
1H Dbl Pass 1NT
Pass Pass Pass
------------------------------------------
IMP-1315 jec Dlr: North
Board 9 S KQJ75 Vul: E-W
H J753
gabipest D QT jakartajl
S 43 C K8 S T62
H T4 H KQ86
D AJ98653 miamiwiz D 7
C Q6 S A98 C J7532
H A92
D K42
C AT94
East South West North
gabipest jec jakartajl miamiwiz
60.59 60.41 59.44 56.44
1C
2D 2S Pass 3NT
Pass Pass Pass
------------------------------------------
IMP-1282 jec Dlr: West
Board 4 S T753 Vul: Both
H A86
PYG D A974 Jackth
S A842 C J5 S QJ
H T5 H J732
D K5 weedo D JT83
C T8632 S K96 C A74
H KQ94
D Q62
C KQ9
East South West North
PYG jec Jackth weedo
62.06 60.41 54.73 49.66
Pass 1C
Pass 1S Pass 1NT
Pass Pass Pass
---------------------------------------
IMP-351 smispi Dlr: West
Board 4 S A3 Vul: Both
H KJ3
weedo D J97 earlg
S 98 C AJ632 S QJ642
H 987652 H 4
D T5 jec D K6432
C KQ9 S KT75 C 74
H AQT
D AQ8
C T85
East South West North
weedo smispi earlg jec
49.66 58.12 51.79 60.41
Pass 1NT
Pass 3NT Pass Pass
Pass
------------------------------------------
IMP-351 jec Dlr: East
Board 14 S K8 Vul: None
H K2
earlg D 97654 weedo
S T62 C AQ85 S QJ54
H J963 H A854
D 2 smispi D JT83
C KT632 S A973 C J
H QT7
D AKQ
C 974
17-Dec-05 2:02:44 AM
First 1:30:42 AM, Last 2:02:44 AM
West North East South
earlg jec weedo smispi
Pass 1NT
Pass 3NT Pass Pass
Pass
------------------------------------------
IMP-875 miamiwiz Dlr: North
Board 5 S AK Vul: N-S
H 7
lokaty D A9862 satyryk
S 95 C KJT84 S JT8642
H KQT943 H J65
D QT3 jec D J7 --Ben--
#19
Posted 2008-September-15, 08:21
Board 5 S AK Vul: N-S
H 7
lokaty D A9862 satyryk
S 95 C KJT84 S JT8642
H KQT943 H J65
D QT3 jec D J7
C 62 S Q73 C 97
H A82
D K54
C AQ53
23-Dec-05 12:57:26 AM
First 12:55:46 AM, Last 12:57:26 AM
East South West North
lokaty miamiwiz satyryk jec
1NT
3H 4D Pass 5D
Pass 6D Pass Pass
Pass
------------------------------------------
IMP-771 jec Dlr: West
Board 20 S KT7 Vul: Both
H JT83
sillafu D A76 snabu
S Q943 C K42 S J8
H K4 H A762
D T2 smispi D J9853
C QJ963 S A652 C T5
H Q95
D KQ4
C A87
14-Jan-06 2:34:47 AM
First 2:32:30 AM, Last 2:34:47 AM
West North East South
sillafu jec snabu smispi
Pass Pass Pass 1NT
Pass 3NT Pass Pass
Pass
------------------------------------------
IMP-703 ollina Dlr: North
Board 25 S K8542 Vul: E-W
H
caracci D QJ32 loloc
S 7 C QT75 S QJT3
H J9852 H KQT63
D 9754 jec D K6
C 843 S A96 C AJ
H A74
D AT8
C K962
24-Jan-06 2:33:45 AM
First 2:33:45 AM, Last 3:00:22 AM
East South West North
caracci ollina loloc jec
1NT
Pass 2H Dbl 2S
Pass 4S Pass Pass
Pass
------------------------------------------
IMP-662 ollina Dlr: North
Board 13 S Q542 Vul: Both
H JT7
LLORENZO D T92 nevaio
S 986 C AQ8 S J7
H K43 H AQ62
D 64 jec D AJ753
C J9754 S AKT3 C 62
H 985
D KQ8
C KT3
29-Jan-06 9:10:03 PM
First 9:10:03 PM, Last 9:20:49 PM
East South West North
LLORENZO ollina nevaio jec
1NT
Pass 2NT Pass 3NT
Pass Pass Pass
#20
Posted 2008-September-15, 09:40
han, on Sep 14 2008, 09:46 AM, said:
pclayton, on Sep 14 2008, 11:42 AM, said:
Yes, I would open 1NT with this hand, you don't have enough respect for spotcards Phil.
To upgrade out of a 1NT opening you will need to give me a better hand.
Han, you can keep your spotcards. I'll take AK-5th over 10's and 9's any day

Help
