tourney hand
#2
Posted 2008-September-02, 13:15
I think the West hand has too much for stuff for a weak 2.
I can't objectively bid these cards to slam.
#3
Posted 2008-September-02, 14:03
At very least, I remember seeing a weak 2 - 2NT - pass lately, and wincing.
V
"gwnn" said:
hanp does not always mean literally what he writes.
#4
Posted 2008-September-02, 14:20
2S-2N-
4D (I am 6-5 with a self sufficient suit)-4N
6D (1 with a void)-P
#5
Posted 2008-September-02, 15:48
ASkolnick, on Sep 2 2008, 03:20 PM, said:
2S-2N-
4D (I am 6-5 with a self sufficient suit)-4N
6D (1 with a void)-P
And if east had x AKQxxx KQJTx x, how would the bidding be any different? That is aside from the fact that west has way too much playing strength to open 2.
This is simply too hard of a slam to bid with any realistic auction, IMO. To get close, west would have to open 1♠, and when east responds in hearts then west will never show that void.
#7
Posted 2008-September-02, 17:03
- hrothgar
#8
Posted 2008-September-02, 17:18
2♠-3♥
4♦
Other than that, best chance is East opens out of turn and South accepts it.
Call me Desdinova...Eternal Light
C. It's the nexus of the crisis and the origin of storms.
IV: ace 333: pot should be game, idk
e: "Maybe God remembered how cute you were as a carrot."
#9
Posted 2008-September-03, 00:53
Even after 1♠ it's hard to see any sane auction getting to 6♦, without some real gambling and luck involved.
The only possibility is:
1♠ - 2♥
2♠ - 3♦
4♥
Where 4♥ shows a void on the way to 5♦. I don't think many will have an explicit agreement here, and without it, you just can't pull that trick.
Harald
#10
Posted 2008-September-04, 02:23
1♠-2♥
2♠-3♦
4♦-4♥
4♠-5♣
6♦
4♥, 4♠ and 5♣ were cue-bids. I'm not sure about the 6♦ bid.
#11
Posted 2008-September-04, 02:57
I may pass the West hand, the hand is way too strong
for a weak two, ... and to open 3S, even for such a
opening the hand is quite strong, even if you take the
vulnerability into account, and you may go heavily against
the field.
The hand is too weak to open 1S (at least for us) or simply
say the hand is not suitable for an 1S opening.
Assuming the opponents dont come in, which is not likely
with their actual holding, the bidding may go
Pass .. - 1H
1S ..... - 3D (1)
4D (2) - .... (3)
(1) I think, even I would force to game, with this one
(2) max. hand, slam interst
(3) soemhow you will reach 6D
The decision to pass would have been a succesful decision
this time, but it can backfire.
The only safety is, that you hold the spades, and that you
always can come in later.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#12
Posted 2008-September-04, 03:10
#13
Posted 2008-September-18, 05:00
onoway, on Sep 2 2008, 01:57 PM, said:
|
| what is the right way to bid this? Checking the traveller, bids were all over the place. If bidding goes P 2♠ P then what? This was in a BIL tourney so 2NT asking for a feature didn't work very well (got left in it for -1 on a ♣ lead) |
IMO The West hand is worth a 1 opener but I still don't see how to bid the slam. At pairs, you would be happy to play in 4♠, but the bidding is more likely to go...
1♠-2♥
2♠-3♦
4♦-4N
5♦-P
#14
Posted 2008-September-18, 11:16
Over a 2♠ opening, I would bid 4♥. And if the auction got complicated, West should just bid 4♠.
Except for 6♦, either major suit game should beat or tie any pair in diamonds.
At IMPs, I can understand getting to 5♦, although game in either major still makes a lot of sense. It is unlikely that any pair would bid the slam except by accident.
#15
Posted 2008-September-19, 12:21
1 ♠ - 2♥
2♠ - 3♦
5♦? - 6♦?
Is the leap to 5 diamonds warranted? Not sure. I would think East has 4 or more diamonds a very large % of the time. You have more than an opening (ZAR) hand after finding the diamond fit. So I think 5 diamonds is quite reasonable and will make a good % of the time. Once West bids 5, I think East is wimpy to not bid 6.

Help

what is the right way to bid this? Checking the traveller, bids were all over the place.
If bidding goes P 2♠ P then what? This was in a BIL tourney so 2NT asking for a feature didn't work very well (got left in it for -1 on a ♣ lead)