What do you bid with this? 1S or 1NT?
#1
Posted 2008-August-20, 11:19
Unless explicitly stated, none of my views here can be taken to represent SCBA or any other organizations.
#3
Posted 2008-August-20, 11:51
1NT can always get us to 3♦, but our diamond suit is a bit ratty.
Edit: I forgot to give my choice. I think I'll go with 1♠, but I think it's close.
#5
Posted 2008-August-20, 12:25
I mean, 1♠ forcing notrump, then pass the 2♦ transfer rebid.
#7
Posted 2008-August-20, 13:32
#8
Posted 2008-August-20, 15:17
#10
Posted 2008-August-20, 15:46
1nt=3d shows this hand no problem.
1h=1s
2h=pass...no problem......3d rebid here is forcing.
1h=1s
2c=3d is invite not weak.
1h=1nt
?=3d shows long d weakish....
#11
Posted 2008-August-21, 18:44
--Always remember you're unique. Just like everyone else.
#12
Posted 2008-August-22, 00:28
If I respond 1♠ and partner rebids 1N, my methods allow me to get out in 2 diamonds, but if he responds 2 clubs, which is not unlikely in a uncontested auction (someone has to have them!), then I'm screwed.
#13
Posted 2008-August-22, 01:48
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
#15
Posted 2008-August-22, 03:31
#16
Posted 2008-August-22, 08:08
Very interresting thread
I like the ideia of the ♦ suit taking precedence over the ♠.
And what would happen with a more balanced hand, say something like
xxxx AJx Txx Txx and partner opening 1♦, should we always mention the 4 spades even if they are 2345 ?
Pedro
#17
Posted 2008-August-22, 08:22
#18
Posted 2008-August-28, 02:38
PedroG, on Aug 22 2008, 09:08 AM, said:
Very interresting thread
I like the ideia of the ♦ suit taking precedence over the ♠.
And what would happen with a more balanced hand, say something like
xxxx AJx Txx Txx and partner opening 1♦, should we always mention the 4 spades even if they are 2345 ?
Pedro
With this responding hand, the only question is, if you
should pass or not, if you decide to respond 1S is clear
cut.
For that matter the reason, why the peoble choose to
ignore the spade suit is, that the diamond suit is a 7
carder, make it a 6 carder and most would respond 1S.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#19
Posted 2008-August-28, 03:02
P_Marlowe, on Aug 28 2008, 03:38 AM, said:
PedroG, on Aug 22 2008, 09:08 AM, said:
Very interresting thread
I like the ideia of the ♦ suit taking precedence over the ♠.
And what would happen with a more balanced hand, say something like
xxxx AJx Txx Txx and partner opening 1♦, should we always mention the 4 spades even if they are 2345 ?
Pedro
With this responding hand, the only question is, if you
should pass or not, if you decide to respond 1S is clear
cut.
For that matter the reason, why the peoble choose to
ignore the spade suit is, that the diamond suit is a 7
carder, make it a 6 carder and most would respond 1S.
With kind regards
Marlowe
PARD OPENS 1D?
Easy 1s response...no problem yet
#20
Posted 2008-August-28, 03:04
Bid on most 5 counts....with an Ace
On this one I got tens ...easy
"xxxx AJx Txx Txx and partner opening 1♦, should we always mention the 4 s"
My main point is..we do not lose event because we bid one spade..we lose event for many other reasons.
btw I bid 1nt on OP.

Help

Partner opens 1♥, what do you respond?