p-p-1♠-X
2NT-3♣-p-3♠
X-p-p-4♣
2NT showed some sort of 4 card fit/limit raise/something
Page 1 of 1
spingold hand
#2
Posted 2008-July-28, 06:47
Yes. 3♠ was game-forcing.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
#4
Posted 2008-July-28, 07:36
Quote
Yes, and passing 3♠ x-ed should show some interest.
From Psych "I mean, Gus and I never see eye-to-eye on work stuff.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
Page 1 of 1

Help
