Pressure decision.
#2
Posted 2008-July-17, 16:12
Parnter might easily have something like Qxxx AJx x ATxxx.
I'm not sure if I'd double or bid here, but I'm certain that IF I bid, 6♦ wouldn't be my choise. I'd rather try 5NT - pick a slam.
Harald
#3
Posted 2008-July-17, 16:15
#4
Posted 2008-July-17, 16:21
skaeran, on Jul 17 2008, 05:12 PM, said:
We're not down yet!
I have no idea how my partners would interpret 5NT. I don't want to find out.
#5
Posted 2008-July-17, 16:28
#6
Posted 2008-July-17, 17:53
Double may be the big winner but I like slam chances too much... and anyone who thinks that partner is pulling 5♦ is dreaming.. we're the one with the diamond void... (ok, he could be short as well, but I'm betting he has more diamonds than we do, and thus probably too many to pull). I say this as someone who likes to note negative and responsive doubles through 7♠
#7
Posted 2008-July-17, 19:06
mikeh, on Jul 17 2008, 06:53 PM, said:
Curious. What would you bid with a slam-going 3316? 6♣? Or 5NT?
How about 4315?
(Edit, yes, I know that's not enough info by itself...but in general).
#9
Posted 2008-July-18, 03:34
jtfanclub, on Jul 18 2008, 02:06 AM, said:
mikeh, on Jul 17 2008, 06:53 PM, said:
Curious. What would you bid with a slam-going 3316? 6♣? Or 5NT?
How about 4315?
(Edit, yes, I know that's not enough info by itself...but in general).
3316 I would bid 6C if I'm strong enough to bid a slam.
4315 sounds more like a double.
#10
Posted 2008-July-18, 03:44
#11
Posted 2008-July-18, 04:26
#12
Posted 2008-July-18, 07:41
6D is horrid (imo), as you preclude 6C as a valid contract.
So many experts, not enough X cards.
#13
Posted 2008-July-19, 19:14
partner had Kxxx, J10xx, Ax, Axx, hearts 4-1 meant no posibility to make any contract you bid.
#14
Posted 2008-July-21, 09:34
mikeh, on Jul 17 2008, 06:53 PM, said:
This treatment is poor, imo. Roger and I play them through 7♥, which I think is clearly superior.
#15
Posted 2008-July-21, 17:20
kfay, on Jul 21 2008, 10:34 AM, said:
mikeh, on Jul 17 2008, 06:53 PM, said:
This treatment is poor, imo. Roger and I play them through 7♥, which I think is clearly superior.
It beats my neg/responsive doubles to 7NT though.
--Always remember you're unique. Just like everyone else.
#16
Posted 2008-July-21, 17:57

Help

W - N - E - S
1♦-X-5♦-??