BBO Discussion Forums: 6 5 come alive - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

6 5 come alive

#1 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2008-July-07, 20:08

x
KQJTxx
x
JT9xx

1-p-2-?

all white imps
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#2 User is offline   655321 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,502
  • Joined: 2007-December-22

Posted 2008-July-07, 20:13

3
That's impossible. No one can give more than one hundred percent. By definition that is the most anyone can give.
0

#3 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2008-July-07, 20:15

3 is enough
0

#4 User is offline   analysismi 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 21
  • Joined: 2008-July-05

Posted 2008-July-10, 05:58

Well this seems like it should be a 2NT bid, with partnership agreement.
Reason: They have shown 23points between them. . do you really a bid that shows 15-17 balanced against that? If you decide no, than you can use 2NT as a bid forcing p to choose between the other two suits. (Incidentally, you should have an agreement for what cuebids of their suits mean. . . you may wish to play them "unusual vs. unusual" style, where cuebidding their top suit shows a strong hand in the highest unbid suit and cuebidding their bottom suit shows a strong hand in their lowest suit. This only works if both opponents bids show 4+ cards. If the opening bid is one of a minor, I would play they have only shown responders suit, as openers suit may be 3 or even 2 cards. IN this situation I play cuebid of responders suit is michael's, bidding openers suit is natural.) But undiscussed, 3H or even double seems reasonable as you'd like to hear which suit P likes, but 3H is more preemptive so I'd go with that.

But it is dangerous to play a non-jump 2NT as unusual with a p you do not know, so undiscussed I would probably bid 3H, but double also seems reasonable.
0

#5 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2008-July-10, 06:02

wat?
0

#6 User is offline   mcphee 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,514
  • Joined: 2003-February-16

Posted 2008-July-10, 07:03

Well I am sure 3 is enough but 4 is hanging neck right out there, forgive me for sin great shuffler, I have seen minus 800 before.
0

#7 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2008-July-10, 07:54

Jlall, on Jul 10 2008, 07:02 AM, said:

wat?

learning Dutch Justin?
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#8 User is offline   jtfanclub 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,937
  • Joined: 2004-June-05

Posted 2008-July-10, 10:49

analysismi, on Jul 10 2008, 06:58 AM, said:

Well this seems like it should be a 2NT bid, with partnership agreement.

Uh, I have 6 hearts in a pretty much self-sufficient suit, and 5 fairly rotten clubs.

If I had

x
JT9xx
x
KQJTxx

I might consider a two-suit bid, since the default should be that the minor is better than the major.

I prefer a cue-bid for my two-suit bids myself (2 or 3). Not like I'll need 2 for a natural call, ever.
0

#9 User is offline   analysismi 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 21
  • Joined: 2008-July-05

Posted 2008-July-10, 19:36

If you hit a club fit you'll still run 5 heart tricks.
0

#10 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2008-July-11, 03:52

jtfanclub, on Jul 10 2008, 06:49 PM, said:

analysismi, on Jul 10 2008, 06:58 AM, said:

Well this seems like it should be a 2NT bid, with partnership agreement.

Uh, I have 6 hearts in a pretty much self-sufficient suit, and 5 fairly rotten clubs.

If I had

x
JT9xx
x
KQJTxx

I might consider a two-suit bid, since the default should be that the minor is better than the major.

I prefer a cue-bid for my two-suit bids myself (2 or 3). Not like I'll need 2 for a natural call, ever.

but you'll need a natural 2NT?
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users