BBO Discussion Forums: competitive bidding question - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

competitive bidding question

#1 User is offline   rbforster 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,611
  • Joined: 2006-March-18

Posted 2008-July-03, 12:42

The auction goes like this and you're 4th to bid holding a decent heart suit -

(1)-2-(2)-?

X would be responsive for the unbid suits. 2N is undiscussed but probably natural(?).

What do you bid with an invitational or game-forcing hand with hearts?

- Is 3 forcing? If 3 is forcing, can you double and convert 3m to 3 to invite, or does that imply some other sort of hand?
- What do you do with a game going hand, but when your hearts (maybe only 5 or 6 poor ones) aren't good enough to insist on strain by just bidding 4 yourself?
0

#2 User is offline   Apollo81 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,162
  • Joined: 2006-July-10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 2008-July-03, 12:54

3 is forcing, Double then 3 is not forcing
0

#3 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2008-July-03, 13:21

Apollo81, on Jul 3 2008, 01:54 PM, said:

3 is forcing, Double then 3 is not forcing

Perhaps strangely, I would have assumed the opposite. I claim no authority on this, though.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#4 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2008-July-04, 00:33

Perhaps not strangely I would have assumed the opposite from Ken, but I claim no autority on this either.
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#5 User is offline   rogerclee 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,214
  • Joined: 2007-December-16
  • Location:Pasadena, CA

Posted 2008-July-04, 00:41

Apollo81, on Jul 3 2008, 11:54 AM, said:

3 is forcing, Double then 3 is not forcing

Agree.
0

#6 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,482
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2008-July-04, 01:54

3H is non-forcing and not a fit bid, it just shows hearts.
Double then bid hearts with a good hand with hearts.
0

#7 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2008-July-04, 02:00

3 is non-forcing, Double then 3 is forcing. This is better for two reasons:

- A competitive 3 is much more likely to occur than a game-forcing one
- When you make an off-shape takeout double, there is a risk of partner overcompeting in the suit that you have shown but don't have (clubs in this case). The stronger you are, the less this risk, and the more likely you are to be able to cope if it does occur.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#8 User is offline   OleBerg 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,950
  • Joined: 2008-April-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Copenhagen
  • Interests:Model-Railways.

Posted 2008-July-04, 02:32

gnasher, on Jul 4 2008, 10:00 AM, said:

3 is non-forcing, Double then 3 is forcing.  This is better for two reasons:

- A competitive 3 is much more likely to occur than a game-forcing one
- When you make an off-shape takeout double, there is a risk of partner overcompeting in the suit that you have shown but don't have (clubs in this case).  The stronger you are, the less this risk, and the more likely you are to be able to cope if it does occur.

Not saying that your way isn't the best, but the double with a good heart-suit is more vulnerable to a 3 or 4 call from opener.
_____________________________________

Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.

Best Regards Ole Berg

_____________________________________

We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:

- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.


Gnasher
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users